Literature DB >> 17674637

The efficacy of stage-matched and standard public health materials for promoting physical activity in the workplace: the Physical Activity Workplace Study (PAWS).

Ronald C Plotnikoff1, Stephanie Brunet, Kerry S Courneya, John C Spence, Nicholas J Birkett, Bess Marcus, Jessica Whiteley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of stage-matched and standard print materials for physical activity (PA) change.
DESIGN: Participants were randomized into (1) a stage-matched intervention group (n = 165), (2) a standard intervention group (n = 176), or (3) a no-contact control group (n = 166). The stage-matched and standard intervention groups both received materials at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Assessments of all three groups were conducted at baseline, 6, and 12 months.
SETTING: Canadian worksites.
SUBJECTS: Employees (N = 507).
INTERVENTIONS: Five motivationally targeted booklets were developed for the stage-matched group. The standard group received Canada's Physical Activity Guide and handbook. MEASURES: The main dependent variable was PA, expressed as metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes and measured using the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire. Demographic characteristics and stages of change for PA were also assessed.
RESULTS: At 12 months mean weekly MET minutes for combined moderate and vigorous activity increased from baseline by 223, 67, and 78 for the stage-matched, standard, and control groups, respectively; however, differences were not significant (p > .05). Women in the stage-matched group over the 12-month period significantly increased their activity by 327 weekly MET minutes whereas the standard and control groups declined their activity (F = 3.01, p < .05).
CONCLUSION: PA stage-matched materials delivered in the workplace are efficacious for women but not men. Future interventions should explore the use of these intervention materials in conjunction with multilevel strategies, and particular attention should be paid to possible gender differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17674637     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-21.6.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  11 in total

Review 1.  Promoting health and wellness in the workplace: a unique opportunity to establish primary and extended secondary cardiovascular risk reduction programs.

Authors:  Ross Arena; Marco Guazzi; Paige D Briggs; Lawrence P Cahalin; Jonathan Myers; Leonard A Kaminsky; Daniel E Forman; Gerson Cipriano; Audrey Borghi-Silva; Abraham Samuel Babu; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  A review of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for adult males.

Authors:  Emma S George; Gregory S Kolt; Mitch J Duncan; Cristina M Caperchione; W Kerry Mummery; Corneel Vandelanotte; Pennie Taylor; Manny Noakes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Mediators of physical activity behaviour change among adult non-clinical populations: a review update.

Authors:  Ryan E Rhodes; Leila A Pfaeffli
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  A test of cognitive mediation in a 12-month physical activity workplace intervention: does it explain behaviour change in women?

Authors:  Ronald C Plotnikoff; Michael A Pickering; Ryan E Rhodes; Kerry S Courneya; John C Spence
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Assessing the physical activity environment in Mexican healthcare settings.

Authors:  Karla I Galaviz; Rebecca E Lee; Kim Bergeron; Lucie Lévesque
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

Review 6.  Face-to-face versus remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity.

Authors:  Justin Richards; Margaret Thorogood; Melvyn Hillsdon; Charles Foster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-30

7.  LightSit: An Unobtrusive Health-Promoting System for Relaxation and Fitness Microbreaks at Work.

Authors:  Xipei Ren; Bin Yu; Yuan Lu; Biyong Zhang; Jun Hu; Aarnout Brombacher
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Alberta Diabetes and Physical Activity Trial (ADAPT): a randomized theory-based efficacy trial for adults with type 2 diabetes--rationale, design, recruitment, evaluation, and dissemination.

Authors:  Ronald C Plotnikoff; Kerry S Courneya; Ronald J Sigal; Jeffrey A Johnson; Nicholas Birkett; David Lau; Kim Raine; Steven T Johnson; Nandini Karunamuni
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Physical fitness cognition, assessment, and promotion: A cross-sectional study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Te-Wei Ho; Hsing-Hua Tsai; Jui-Fen Lai; Sue-Min Chu; Wan-Chung Liao; Han-Mo Chiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Does knowledge of physical activity recommendations increase physical activity among Chinese college students? Empirical investigations based on the transtheoretical model.

Authors:  Kahar Abula; Peter Gröpel; Kai Chen; Jürgen Beckmann
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 7.179

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.