Literature DB >> 17674212

Issues in diisocyanate antibody testing.

M Gerald Ott1, Athena T Jolly, Amy L Burkert, William E Brown.   

Abstract

Diisocyanates are used to produce a wide variety of polyurethane products; they are also recognized as an important cause of occupational asthma. Their chemical reactivity presents challenges to toxicologists and clinicians alike seeking to understand the mechanisms underlying diisocyanate asthma. In this article, we review the literature on immunoassay detection of IgE and IgG binding to diisocyanate-protein conjugates and assess the utility of such testing as a diagnostic tool and exposure indicator. Data from 29 studies of occupational exposure to diisocyanates revealed considerable variability in assay methodology and heterogeneity in the prevalence of positive antibody responses across laboratories. In studies that included both confirmed diisocyanate asthma subjects and exposed nonasthmatics, positive IgE responses identified cases with low sensitivity (18-27%), but high specificity (96-98%). Detection of IgG binding to diisocyanate conjugates is an indirect, qualitative indicator of disease status and past diisocyanate exposure. The utility of these assays is limited, however, due to a lack of (1) method standardization, (2) population norms to guide interpretation of results, and (3) demonstration that the assays improve either on disease prediction or on exposure confirmation beyond that of other indicators. Sources of assay heterogeneity are discussed and suggestions are offered for improving test performance and interpretability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17674212     DOI: 10.1080/10408440701419553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  7 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of occupational asthma: an update.

Authors:  Edgardo J Jares; Carlos E Baena-Cagnani; R Maximiliano Gómez
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Skin and respiratory chemical allergy: confluence and divergence in a hybrid adverse outcome pathway.

Authors:  Ian Kimber; Alan Poole; David A Basketter
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Monoclonal antibodies against toluene diisocyanate haptenated proteins from vapor-exposed mice.

Authors:  Tinashe B Ruwona; Victor J Johnson; Detlef Schmechel; Reuben H Simoyi; Donald Beezhold; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Hybridoma (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-06

4.  Characterization and comparative analysis of 2,4-toluene diisocyanate and 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate haptenated human serum albumin and hemoglobin.

Authors:  Morgen Mhike; Justin M Hettick; Itai Chipinda; Brandon F Law; Toni A Bledsoe; Angela R Lemons; Ajay P Nayak; Brett J Green; Donald H Beezhold; Reuben H Simoyi; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Characterization of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate-haptenated human serum albumin and hemoglobin.

Authors:  Morgen Mhike; Itai Chipinda; Justin M Hettick; Reuben H Simoyi; Angela Lemons; Brett J Green; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  The influence of diisocyanate antigen preparation methodology on monoclonal and serum antibody recognition.

Authors:  Lauren M Hagerman; Brandon F Law; Toni A Bledsoe; Justin M Hettick; Michael L Kashon; Angela R Lemons; Adam V Wisnewski; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Does diisocyanate exposure result in neurotoxicity?

Authors:  M A Hughes; M Carson; M A Collins; A T Jolly; D M Molenaar; W Steffens; G M H Swaen
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.467

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.