Literature DB >> 17673994

An analysis of the clinical development of drugs in Norway for the years 2000 and 2004: the influence of the pharmaceutical industry.

Finn O Winther1, Ola P Hole, Sigurd Nitter-Hauge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Little has been published either concerning the total number of research projects in connection with clinical development of drugs or the number of projects financially supported by the industry.
METHODS: From the archives of the five regional Norwegian Research Ethical Committees (REC), all research projects in connection with clinical development of drugs for the years 2000 and 2004 were analysed with the intention of finding the number of projects financially supported by the industry, the type of research institution, the industrial company, the topic of the research as classified in the international Anatomic Therapeutic Classification system (ATC), the research phase and the approval status of the drug by the Norwegian Medicines Agency (NMA).
RESULTS: The total number of research projects for the clinical development of drugs for the years 2000 and 2004 was 489, and 75.7% were financially supported by the industry. More than two-thirds of the projects were done in academic institutions and about one-third were equally divided between public health hospitals and private health service/hospitals. Eight of the 88 drug companies involved were among the world's largest and supported 38% of the projects. Fifty-nine percent of all the projects were within four therapeutic groups: antineoplastic/immunomodulating agents, nervous system, cardiovascular system and alimentary tract/metabolism. The distribution of research phases was as follows: phase I 1.2%, phase II 16.4%, phase III 26.6% and phase IV 55.8%. In the phase IV drug trials, drugs had been approved for sale by the NMA.
CONCLUSIONS: The share of research projects related to the development of drugs supported by the industry is high. Research independent of the industry is of importance to avoid bias and selective publications and to prevent research as a means of marketing. Independent research should be encouraged and financially supported by sources with no connection to the drug industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17673994     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-007-0342-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  7 in total

1.  Clinical research: the influence of the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  O P Hole; F O Winther; B Straume
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Uneasy alliance--clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  T Bodenheimer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin; Lisa A Bero; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Otavio Clark
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-31

Review 4.  Evidence b(i)ased medicine--selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications.

Authors:  Hans Melander; Jane Ahlqvist-Rastad; Gertie Meijer; Björn Beermann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-31

Review 5.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Yan Li; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Financial conflicts of interest in physicians' relationships with the pharmaceutical industry--self-regulation in the shadow of federal prosecution.

Authors:  David M Studdert; Michelle M Mello; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.

Authors:  Anders W Jørgensen; Jørgen Hilden; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-10-06
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  An analysis of the clinical development of drugs in Norway for the year 2000: the completion of research and publication of results.

Authors:  Ola P Hole; Sigurd Nitter-Hauge; Henrik R Cederkvist; Finn O Winther
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Clinical drug trials in general practice: a 10-year overview of protocols.

Authors:  Anja Maria Brænd; Kaspar Buus Jensen; Atle Klovning; Jørund Straand
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.