BACKGROUND: The purpose of treatment in patients with advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer is to improve symptoms and maintain quality of life. Recently, the regimen including epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-FU (ECF) has been used with protracted venous infusion (PVI), and has been reported to be an effective treatment for advanced and metastatic esophagogastric cancer. However, complications and the inconvenience associated with PVI cannot be justified for the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. Therefore, we provided treatment with oral UFT and leucovorin instead of 5-FU PVI to improve convenience and catheter related complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced esophageal cancer were admitted between March 2002 and April 2005. The treatment schedule was as follows: epirubicin 50 mg/m2 iv on d 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 iv on d 1, oral UFT 300 mg/m2 and leucovorin 75 mg for 21 consecutive days of treatment followed by a 7-d treatment-free interval. RESULTS: The response rate was 45.9% including one complete response (95% CI: 29.8%-62%). The median survival was 13 mo (95% CI: 10-16 mo). Four patients had adenocarcinoma. Interestingly, their response rate was 75% including one complete response. Myelosuppression was the most important toxicity. Other toxicities were tolerable. CONCLUSION: The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, UFT, and leucovorin (EPUL) could be another alternative to ECF in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. And this treatment might be more effective in adenocarcinoma of esophageal cancer.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of treatment in patients with advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer is to improve symptoms and maintain quality of life. Recently, the regimen including epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-FU (ECF) has been used with protracted venous infusion (PVI), and has been reported to be an effective treatment for advanced and metastatic esophagogastric cancer. However, complications and the inconvenience associated with PVI cannot be justified for the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. Therefore, we provided treatment with oral UFT and leucovorin instead of 5-FU PVI to improve convenience and catheter related complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced esophageal cancer were admitted between March 2002 and April 2005. The treatment schedule was as follows: epirubicin 50 mg/m2 iv on d 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 iv on d 1, oral UFT 300 mg/m2 and leucovorin 75 mg for 21 consecutive days of treatment followed by a 7-d treatment-free interval. RESULTS: The response rate was 45.9% including one complete response (95% CI: 29.8%-62%). The median survival was 13 mo (95% CI: 10-16 mo). Four patients had adenocarcinoma. Interestingly, their response rate was 75% including one complete response. Myelosuppression was the most important toxicity. Other toxicities were tolerable. CONCLUSION: The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, UFT, and leucovorin (EPUL) could be another alternative to ECF in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. And this treatment might be more effective in adenocarcinoma of esophageal cancer.
Authors: P Ross; M Nicolson; D Cunningham; J Valle; M Seymour; P Harper; T Price; H Anderson; T Iveson; T Hickish; F Lofts; A Norman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-04-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Bamias; M E Hill; D Cunningham; A R Norman; F Y Ahmed; A Webb; M Watson; A S Hill; M C Nicolson; M E O'Brien; T C Evans; V Nicolson Journal: Cancer Date: 1996-05-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Dong Yi Kim; Kyeung Won Seo; Jae Kyoon Joo; Young Kyu Park; Seong Yeob Ryu; Hyeong Rok Kim; Young Jin Kim; Shin Kon Kim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-02-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Matheus Lohan-Codeço; Maria Luísa Barambo-Wagner; Luiz Eurico Nasciutti; Luis Felipe Ribeiro Pinto; Nathalia Meireles Da Costa; Antonio Palumbo Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 9.261