Literature DB >> 17673579

Revision total hip replacement using cemented collarless double-taper femoral components.

D W Howie1, J A Wimhurst, M A McGee, T A Carbone, B S Badaruddin.   

Abstract

We investigated 219 revisions of total hip replacement (THR) in 211 patients using a collarless double-taper cemented femoral component. The mean age of the patients was 72 years (30 to 90). The 137 long and 82 standard length stems were analysed separately. The mean follow-up was six years (2 to 18), and no patient was lost to follow-up. Survival of the long stems to re-revision for aseptic loosening at nine years was 98% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94 to 100), and for the standard stems was 93% (95% CI 85 to 100). At five years, one long stem was definitely loose radiologically and one standard stem was probably loose. Pre-operative femoral bone deficiency did not influence the results for the long stems, and corrective femoral osteotomy was avoided, as were significant subsidence, major stress shielding and persistent thigh pain. Because of these reliable results, cemented long collarless double-taper femoral components are recommended for routine revision THR in older patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17673579     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.18981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Cement-in-cement hip revision with a long-stemmed femoral component].

Authors:  T K Lichtinger; A Pingsmann; N Erol; C Schulze-Pellengahr; W Teske
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Reduced femoral component subsidence with improved impaction grafting at revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D W Howie; S A Callary; M A McGee; N C Russell; L B Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Long, titanium, cemented stems decreased late periprosthetic fractures and revisions in patients with severe bone loss and previous revision.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Hernigou Philippe; Nicolas Dupuys; Dupuys Nicolas; Jerome Delambre; Delambre Jerome; Isaac Guissou; Guissou Isaac; Alexandre Poignard; Poignard Alexandre; Jerome Allain; Allain Jerome; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Mid-term results of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of hip in middle aged patients.

Authors:  Junfeng Zhu; Xiaodong Chen; Yiming Cui; Chao Shen; Guiquan Cai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: modularity of neck and metaphyseal components].

Authors:  G Köster; T A Walde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years.

Authors:  Per Y Adolphson; Mats O F Salemyr; Olof G Sköldenberg; Henrik S G Bodén
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Medium-term follow-up of 92 femoral component revisions using a third-generation cementing technique.

Authors:  Martijn A J Te Stroet; Wim H C Rijnen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Albert Van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.