Literature DB >> 17673355

Do patients want to see recordings of their surgery?

Nikolaos Papadopoulos1, Dimitris Polyzos, Pietro Gambadauro, Panos Papalampros, Lynne Chapman, Adam Magos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In an effort to improve patients' understanding and perception of their surgery and communication between doctors and patients we have evaluated the use of a mobile digital video recorder in the case of women undergoing gynaecological surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients scheduled for endoscopic or open surgery were asked if they would allow their surgery be recorded on a dedicated computer system. Those who agreed were offered the opportunity to have real-time edited highlights of their surgery recorded simultaneously on a miniature digital video recorder. They were shown the edited recording before discharge from hospital, and their reaction was assessed using a structured questionnaire.
RESULTS: 51/54 (94.4%) women agreed to their surgery being recorded on the computer system, and 37/54 (68.5%) asked to see the edited highlights. The median duration of the computer and portable recordings for the 37 patients was 90 min (range 2-280) and 3.3 min (range 1-13.6) respectively. Thirty-four (91.9%) reported that the edited recording gave them a better understanding of their medical condition and surgery. Thirty (81.1%) would have liked a copy of the recording.
CONCLUSIONS: Portable video recorders are a convenient tool for recording surgical procedures. In our experience, about two-third of patients are interested in reviewing their surgery and find it provides useful information and a perceived better understanding of their condition. As these recording devices are small and fit into a pocket, their use could easily become a routine part of post-operative ward rounds. For the surgeon, such recordings have an educational value and provide the basis for a library of surgery as well as being useful when planning future management or for referral purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17673355     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  3 in total

1.  Comparison between camcorder, frontal head and temporal mounted action-cam in digestive surgery: Documentation and educational alternative during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Adeodatus Yuda Handaya; Aditya Rifqi Fauzi; Joshua Andrew; Ahmad Shafa Hanif; Azriel Farrel Kresna Aditya
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-01-23

2.  Cloud Based AI-Driven Video Analytics (CAVs) in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Step Closer to a Virtual Portfolio.

Authors:  Ahmed Gendia
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-12

Review 3.  Anxiety at outpatient hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Pietro Gambadauro; Ramesan Navaratnarajah; Vladimir Carli
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-05-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.