Literature DB >> 17673105

The multiple baseline design for evaluating population-based research.

Nathan G Hawkins1, Robert W Sanson-Fisher, Anthony Shakeshaft, Catherine D'Este, Lawrence W Green.   

Abstract

There is a need for pragmatic and rigorous research designs to evaluate the effectiveness of population-based health interventions. The randomized controlled trial (RCT) has limitations in its practicality, ethical appropriateness, and cost when evaluating population-based interventions. Like RCTs, the multiple baseline design can demonstrate that a change in behavior has occurred, the change is a result of the intervention, and the change is significant. Especially important practical advantages over the RCT are that this design requires fewer population groups and communities may act as their own controls. Advantages and methodologic limitations of the multiple baseline design are discussed, and where feasible, strategies to minimize the impact of its limitations are suggested. Recommendations for future research are included.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17673105     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  70 in total

Review 1.  Studies with staggered starts: multiple baseline designs and group-randomized trials.

Authors:  Dale A Rhoda; David M Murray; Rebecca R Andridge; Michael L Pennell; Erinn M Hade
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  State-of-the-art and future directions in multilevel interventions across the cancer control continuum.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange; Erica S Breslau; Allen J Dietrich; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

Review 3.  Designing studies that would address the multilayered nature of health care.

Authors:  David M Murray; Michael Pennell; Dale Rhoda; Erinn M Hade; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

4.  "Go Girls!": psychological and behavioral outcomes associated with a group-based healthy lifestyle program for adolescent girls.

Authors:  A Justine Dowd; Michelle Y Chen; Mary E Jung; Mark R Beauchamp
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Opioid Overdose Hospitalization Trajectories in States With and Without Opioid-Dosing Guidelines.

Authors:  Jeanne M Sears; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Beryl A Schulman; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Gary M Franklin
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Promoting community coalition functioning: effects of Project STEP.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Riggs; Morgan Nakawatase; Mary Ann Pentz
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2008-05-16

7.  Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen G West; Naihua Duan; Willo Pequegnat; Paul Gaist; Don C Des Jarlais; David Holtgrave; José Szapocznik; Martin Fishbein; Bruce Rapkin; Michael Clatts; Patricia Dolan Mullen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Advancing the science of community-level interventions.

Authors:  Edison J Trickett; Sarah Beehler; Charles Deutsch; Lawrence W Green; Penelope Hawe; Kenneth McLeroy; Robin Lin Miller; Bruce D Rapkin; Jean J Schensul; Amy J Schulz; Joseph E Trimble
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Measuring improvement in populations: implementing and evaluating successful change in lung cancer care.

Authors:  Xinhua Yu; Lisa M Klesges; Mathew P Smeltzer; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

10.  Injury prevention as social change.

Authors:  R J McClure; K Mack; N Wilkins; T M Davey
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.399

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.