Literature DB >> 17672426

Familiar shapes attract attention in figure-ground displays.

Rolf A Nelson1, Stephen E Palmer.   

Abstract

We report five experiments that explore the effect of figure-ground factors on attention. We hypothesized that figural cues, such as familiar shape, would draw attention to the figural side in an attentional cuing task using bipartite figure-ground displays. The first two experiments used faces in profile as the familiar shape and found a perceptual advantage for targets presented on the meaningful side of the central contour in detection speed (Experiment 1) and discrimination accuracy (Experiment 2). The third experiment demonstrated the figural advantage in response time (RT) with nine other familiar shapes (including a sea horse, a guitar, a fir tree, etc.), but only when targets appeared in close proximity to the contour. A fourth experiment obtained a figural advantage in a discrimination task with the larger set of familiar shapes. The final experiment ruled out eye movements as a possible confounding factor by replicating the RT advantage for targets on the figural side of face displays when all trials containing eye movements were eliminated. The results are discussed in terms of ecological influences on attention, and are cast within the framework of Yantis and Jonides's hypothesis that attention is exogenously drawn to the onset of new perceptual objects. We argue that the figural side constitutes an "object" whereas the ground side does not, and that figural cues such as shape familiarity are effective in determining which areas represent objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17672426     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  15 in total

1.  The shape of a hole and that of the surface-with-hole cannot be analyzed separately.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Mai Salah Helmy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Attention is biased to near surfaces.

Authors:  Greg L West; Jay Pratt; Mary A Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

3.  Visual prior entry for foreground figures.

Authors:  Benjamin D Lester; Lauren N Hecht; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

4.  Probing the mechanisms of probe-mediated binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Brian A Metzger; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Figure-ground organization in the visual cortex: does meaning matter?

Authors:  Hee-Kyoung Ko; Rüdiger von der Heydt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Early stages of figure-ground segregation during perception of the face-vase.

Authors:  Michael A Pitts; Antígona Martínez; James B Brewer; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Edge-region grouping in figure-ground organization and depth perception.

Authors:  Stephen E Palmer; Joseph L Brooks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Changes in area affect figure-ground assignment in pigeons.

Authors:  Leyre Castro; Olga F Lazareva; Shaun P Vecera; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Enhanced spatial resolution on figures versus grounds.

Authors:  Lauren N Hecht; Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The role of shape recognition in figure/ground perception in infancy.

Authors:  Hannah White; Rachel Jubran; Alison Heck; Alyson Chroust; Ramesh S Bhatt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.