Literature DB >> 17672187

Intraoperative assessment and quantification of coronary artery graft patency performed on or off cardiopulmonary bypass.

Eric D Rauch1, Christopher Leach, Terry Barnes, Kurt Driscoll, Kurt Strutz, David W Holt.   

Abstract

Within the last 10 years, the incorporation of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) into many surgical practices has grown. OPCAB requires the surgeon to operate on a beating heart, and it is generally accepted that OPCAB procedures are more technically demanding. Concerns of possible incomplete revascularizations and decreased graft patency have been noted in the literature. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare on-pump and off-pump intraoperative coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) flow parameters. Intraoperative flow studies conducted with the Butterfly (Medi-Stim Norge AS, Oslo, Norway) flow meter were analyzed retrospectively on 74 patients. Comparisons were completed between patient groups having had their revascularizations performed on or off cardiopulmonary bypass. Our study revealed significant differences in the mean flow rate through saphenous vein grafts (SVG) to the obtuse marginal artery (OM; p = .014), to the diagonal artery (Diag; p = .003), to the right coronary artery (RCA; p = .001), and to the posterior descending artery (PDA; p = .001). Total blood product use showed significantly increased use of both platelets (PLTs) and cryoprecipitate (Cryo) in the on-pump group (p = .027 and .012, respectively). No differences were found for transfusions of red blood cells (RBCs) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Additional findings showed a significantly decreased median length of stay (LOS) for the off-pump group. The on-pump patients had a median hospital stay of 7 days (range, 4-24 days), whereas the off-pump patients had a median stay of 6 days (range, 3-22 days; p = .049). Although we were able to show some significance in the mean flow data supporting increased graft flow with the on-pump technique, we were not able to show an overall increase in all recorded flow characteristics to support one method over another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17672187      PMCID: PMC4680670     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  32 in total

1.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. The beginning of the end?

Authors:  O Jegaden; P Mikaeloff
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Con: beating-heart surgery for coronary revascularization: is it the most important development since the introduction of the heart-lung machine?

Authors:  D A Cooley
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Intraoperative graft patency verification: should you trust your fingertips?

Authors:  G D'Ancona; H L Karamanoukian; M Ricci; S Schmid; I Spanu; L Apfel; J Bergsland; T A Salerno
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 0.676

4.  The coronary artery bypass conduit: II. Assessment of the quality of the distal anastomosis.

Authors:  J A Wolfe
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Relation of intraoperative flow measurement with postoperative quantitative angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Y Takami; H Ina
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Intraoperative evaluation of coronary anastomosis by transit-time ultrasonic flow measurement.

Authors:  Tetsuro Morota; Francis G Duhaylongsod; William R Burfeind; Ching-Tsorng Huang
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Do coronary bypass graft flows differ between on-pump and off-pump operations?

Authors:  Yves A G Louagie; Jacques Jamart; André Gruslin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Significance and management of early graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting: feasibility and results of acute angiography and re-re-vascularization.

Authors:  C Rasmussen; J J Thiis; P Clemmensen; F Efsen; H C Arendrup; K Saunamäki; J K Madsen; G Pettersson
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Clinical importance of measuring coronary graft flows in the revascularized heart. Ultrasonic or electromagnetic?

Authors:  C C Canver; S D Cooler; E L Murray; R D Nichols; D M Heisey
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.888

10.  A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Natasha E Khan; Anthony De Souza; Rebecca Mister; Marcus Flather; Jonathan Clague; Simon Davies; Peter Collins; Duolao Wang; Ulrich Sigwart; John Pepper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.