Literature DB >> 17671841

P53/MDM2 overexpression in metastatic endometrial cancer: correlation with clinicopathological features and patient outcome.

Ryszard Jeczen1, Danuta Skomra, Marek Cybulski, Regine Schneider-Stock, Wiktor Szewczuk, Albert Roessner, Tomasz Rechberger, Andrzej Semczuk.   

Abstract

Several studies have reported that p53/mdm2 distortions play a pivotal role in the development and progression of various human malignancies. However, the number of reports having evaluated simultaneously the components of the P53-pathway alterations in advanced-stage human endometrial carcinomas (EC) is low. In this study, we examined the expression of P53/MDM2 proteins in primary and metastatic ECs, and analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics as well as the survival outcome of patients in relation to P53/MDM2 overexpression. The study group comprised 36 patients with advanced EC, whose primary and metastatic tumor slides were sufficient for analysis. Immunohistochemical assessment was made by applying anti-human P53 and MDM2 antibodies and a highly sensitive EnVision(+)/HPR visualization system. Nuclear P53 overexpression was seen in 11 (31%) primary ECs and 12 (33%) metastatic tumors. There was a significant correlation between P53 overexpression (in primary cancers and metastatic tumors) and MDM2 overexpression in metastatic tumors. Nuclear MDM2 overexpression was noted in 42% (15/36) of primary carcinomas and in 47% (17/36) of metastatic tumors. A significant association existed between MDM2 overexpression and histological grading (G1 + G2 versus G3, P = 0.043). P53/MDM2 overexpression occurred simultaneously in 7 out of 36 (19%) primary ECs and in 9 out of 36 (25%) metastatic lesions. Concomitant overexpression of these proteins was reported in 7 out of 36 (19%) cases and tended to be higher in tumors showing VSI compared to neoplasms lacking vascular space invasion (P = 0.051). P53 overexpression, either in primary ECs (P < 0.0001) or metastatic lesions (P < 0.0001), was significantly associated with poor survival in univariate analysis. Moreover, the log-rank test demonstrated that simultaneous P53/MDM2 overexpression was also correlated with decreased length of survival. There was no correlation between MDM2 overexpression and patient survival. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that only P53 overexpression is an independent predictor of survival. In conclusion, our data support the view that patients with P53 overexpression are significantly associated with an unfavorable outcome, whereas MDM2 overexpression is not related to decreased survival length in women operated on for advanced-stage EC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17671841     DOI: 10.1007/s10585-007-9087-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis        ISSN: 0262-0898            Impact factor:   4.510


  42 in total

Review 1.  The MDM2-p53 interaction.

Authors:  Ute M Moll; Oleksi Petrenko
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 2.  Signaling to p53: breaking the MDM2-p53 circuit.

Authors:  C Prives
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  TP53 overexpression in recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Johanna M A Pijnenborg; Leonie van de Broek; Geeske C Dam de Veen; Guido M J M Roemen; Jelte de Haan; Manon van Engeland; Jan Willem Voncken; Patrick G Groothuis
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Concerted regulation of wild-type p53 nuclear accumulation and activation by S100B and calcium-dependent protein kinase C.

Authors:  C Scotto; C Delphin; J C Deloulme; J Baudier
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  Prognostic aspects on endometrial hyperplasia and neoplasia.

Authors:  E Sivridis; A Giatromanolaki
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Discriminating functional and non-functional p53 in human tumours by p53 and MDM2 immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  R Nenutil; J Smardova; S Pavlova; Z Hanzelkova; P Muller; P Fabian; R Hrstka; P Janotova; M Radina; D P Lane; P J Coates; B Vojtesek
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.996

7.  Endometrial carcinoma with pleural metastasis: A case report.

Authors:  Andrzej Semczuk; Danuta Skomra; Pawel Rybojad; Ryszard Jeczeń; Tomasz Rechberger
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.319

8.  Relationship between p53 pathway and estrogen receptor status in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Kyoko Maeda; Hiroshi Tsuda; Yasunori Hashiguchi; Kumio Yamamoto; Takeshi Inoue; Osamu Ishiko; Sachio Ogita
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 9.  Cell cycle regulatory functions of the human oncoprotein MDM2.

Authors:  Swati Palit Deb
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 10.  Molecular genetic pathways in various types of endometrial carcinoma: from a phenotypical to a molecular-based classification.

Authors:  Sigurd F Lax
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 4.064

View more
  7 in total

1.  Allelic loss at TP53 in metastatic human endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Wiktor Szewczuk; Danuta Skomra; Marek Cybulski; Dorota Przadka-Rabaniuk; Agata Filip; Maciej Jóźwik; Piotr Olcha; Albert Roessner; Andrzej Semczuk
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 2.  Why target PIM1 for cancer diagnosis and treatment?

Authors:  Nancy S Magnuson; Zeping Wang; Gang Ding; Raymond Reeves
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  RNA interference against MDM2 suppresses tumor growth and metastasis in pancreatic carcinoma SW1990HM cells.

Authors:  Weidong Shi; Zhiqiang Meng; Zhen Chen; Yongqiang Hua; Huifeng Gao; Peng Wang; Junhua Lin; Zhenhua Zhou; Jianmin Luo; Luming Liu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation and MSI status in human endometrial carcinomas with and without metastases.

Authors:  J Bischoff; A Ignatov; A Semczuk; C Schwarzenau; T Ignatov; T Krebs; D Küster; D Przadka-Rabaniuk; A Roessner; S D Costa; R Schneider-Stock
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  Does high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (grade 3 FIGO) belong to type I or type II endometrial cancer? A clinical-pathological and immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  Gian Franco Zannoni; Valerio Gaetano Vellone; Vincenzo Arena; Maria Grazia Prisco; Giovanni Scambia; Arnaldo Carbone; Daniela Gallo
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Well-differentiated mucinous uterine adenocarcinoma predominantly diagnosed as adenoma malignum: a case report with an immunohistochemical analysis.

Authors:  Andrzej Semczuk; Jacek Tomaszewski; Marek Gogacz; Bogdan Obrzut; Marina Rigau; Dorota Lewkowicz; Anna Semczuk-Sikora
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-06-01

7.  Identification of key genes and pathways between type I and type II endometrial cancer using bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Huiyang Li; Ye Yan; Yuqin Zang; Ke Li; Yingmei Wang; Fengxia Xue
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 2.967

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.