Literature DB >> 17671238

Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus infection and disease in women: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Lisa Rambout1, Laura Hopkins, Brian Hutton, Dean Fergusson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is now known to be a necessary cause of cervical cancer, and prophylactic HPV vaccines aimed at preventing genital warts, precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer are now available. To gauge the potential impact on disease burden, we performed a systematic review of the evidence from randomized controlled trials.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the literature to identify all randomized controlled trials of prophylactic HPV vaccination. Reports in 5 electronic databases covering 1950 to June 2007 (MEDLINE, MEDLINE in process, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Library), bibliographies of all included studies and of narrative reviews (2006-2007), clinical trial registries, Google Scholar, public health announcements, selected conference proceedings (2004-2007) and manufacturers' information on unpublished data or ongoing trials were screened against predefined eligibility criteria by 2 independent reviewers. Vaccines had to contain coverage against at least 1 oncogenic HPV strain. The primary outcome of interest was the frequency of high-grade cervical lesions (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, or grade 2 or 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia). The secondary outcomes were persistent HPV infection, low-grade cervical lesions (low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia), external genital lesions, adverse events and death. Meta-analysis of the data was done in all cases where adequate clinical and methodological homogeneity existed.
RESULTS: Of 456 screened reports, 9 were included in the review (6 were reports of randomized controlled trials and 3 were follow-up reports of initial trials). Findings from the meta-analysis showed that prophylactic HPV vaccination was associated with a reduction in the frequency of high-grade cervical lesions caused by vaccine-type HPV strains compared with control groups: Peto odds ratio 0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.21) from combined per-protocol analyses, and 0.52 (95% CI 0.43-0.63) from modified intention-to-treat analyses. Vaccination was also highly efficacious in preventing other HPV-related infection and disease outcomes, including persistent HPV infection, low-grade lesions and genital warts. The majority of adverse events were minor. The incidence of serious adverse events and death were balanced between the vaccine and control groups.
INTERPRETATION: Among women aged 15-25 years not previously infected with vaccine-type HPV strains, prophylactic HPV vaccination appears to be highly efficacious in preventing HPV infection and precancerous cervical disease. Long-term follow-up is needed to substantiate reductions in cervical cancer incidence and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17671238      PMCID: PMC1950172          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.070948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  24 in total

1.  Sustained efficacy up to 4.5 years of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18: follow-up from a randomised control trial.

Authors:  Diane M Harper; Eduardo L Franco; Cosette M Wheeler; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Barbara Romanowski; Cecilia M Roteli-Martins; David Jenkins; Anne Schuind; Sue Ann Costa Clemens; Gary Dubin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Efficacy of human papillomavirus-16 vaccine to prevent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Constance Mao; Laura A Koutsky; Kevin A Ault; Cosette M Wheeler; Darron R Brown; Dorothy J Wiley; Frances B Alvarez; Oliver M Bautista; Kathrin U Jansen; Eliav Barr
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on.

Authors:  Julie M Glanville; Carol Lefebvre; Jeremy N V Miles; Janette Camosso-Stefinovic
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-04

4.  Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE.

Authors:  Sharon S-L Wong; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-01

5.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Authors:  A R Jadad; R A Moore; D Carroll; C Jenkinson; D J Reynolds; D J Gavaghan; H J McQuay
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-02

6.  Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? University of Pennsylvania Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group.

Authors:  J A Berlin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-07-19       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Costs of detection and treatment of cervical cancer, cervical dysplasia and genital warts in the UK.

Authors:  R E Brown; J G Breugelmans; D Theodoratou; S Bénard
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.580

8.  Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efficacy trial.

Authors:  Luisa L Villa; Ronaldo L R Costa; Carlos A Petta; Rosires P Andrade; Kevin A Ault; Anna R Giuliano; Cosette M Wheeler; Laura A Koutsky; Christian Malm; Matti Lehtinen; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Sven-Eric Olsson; Margareta Steinwall; Darron R Brown; Robert J Kurman; Brigitte M Ronnett; Mark H Stoler; Alex Ferenczy; Diane M Harper; Gretchen M Tamms; Jimmy Yu; Lisa Lupinacci; Radha Railkar; Frank J Taddeo; Kathrin U Jansen; Mark T Esser; Heather L Sings; Alfred J Saah; Eliav Barr
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Chapter 3: HPV type-distribution in women with and without cervical neoplastic diseases.

Authors:  Gary Clifford; Silvia Franceschi; Mireia Diaz; Nubia Muñoz; Luisa Lina Villa
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  Efficacy and other milestones for human papillomavirus vaccine introduction.

Authors:  Sonia R Pagliusi; M Teresa Aguado
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  58 in total

1.  Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees.

Authors:  Kevin Pottie; Christina Greenaway; John Feightner; Vivian Welch; Helena Swinkels; Meb Rashid; Lavanya Narasiah; Laurence J Kirmayer; Erin Ueffing; Noni E MacDonald; Ghayda Hassan; Mary McNally; Kamran Khan; Ralf Buhrmann; Sheila Dunn; Arunmozhi Dominic; Anne E McCarthy; Anita J Gagnon; Cécile Rousseau; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  [Public health analysis -- human papillomavirus data and facts for Austria].

Authors:  Ursula Kunze; Gabriela Böhm
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Economic evaluation of policy options for prevention and control of cervical cancer in Thailand.

Authors:  Naiyana Praditsitthikorn; Yot Teerawattananon; Sripen Tantivess; Supon Limwattananon; Arthorn Riewpaiboon; Saibua Chichareon; Nantakan Ieumwananonthachai; Viroj Tangcharoensathien
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Human papillomavirus, vaccines and women's health: questions and cautions.

Authors:  Abby Lippman; Ryan Melnychuk; Carolyn Shimmin; Madeline Boscoe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Vaccination against human papillomavirus.

Authors:  James M Brophy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Routine circumcision: the opposing view.

Authors:  Andrew E Macneily
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Circumcision for all: the pro side.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Houle
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Cervicovaginal self-sampling is a reliable method for determination of prevalence of human papillomavirus genotypes in women aged 20 to 30 years.

Authors:  Yvonne Deleré; Melanie Schuster; Elena Vartazarowa; Thomas Hänsel; Ingke Hagemann; Simone Borchardt; Heike Perlitz; Achim Schneider; Sabine Reiter; Andreas M Kaufmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Efficacy unproven.

Authors:  Martina Dören
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Gardasil® - The New HPV Vaccine: The Right Product, the Right Time? A Commentary.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin; Neil Arya; Sonal Singh
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.