Martin Pinquart1, Paul R Duberstein. 1. Department of Developmental Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany. martin.pinquart@uni-jena.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To reduce the morbidity attributable to anxiety disorders in old age and to improve the quality of care, data on the effectiveness of current treatments are needed. METHODS: A comparative meta-analysis of 32 studies of treatments focused on anxiety disorders in older adults (N = 2,484) receiving behavioral interventions or pharmacotherapy was conducted. RESULTS: In separate analyses of the effects of interventions, stronger improvements of anxiety symptoms are found in pharmacotherapy than in behavioral interventions (d = 1.76 versus d = 0.81 SD units). This difference disappears when computing effect sizes that control for nonspecific change in the control group (d = 0.80 and d = 0.83 SD units) because effect sizes are greater in pill-placebo controls of pharmacological studies than in control groups (e.g., wait list) of behavioral interventions (d = 1.06 versus d = 0.10 SD units). Both interventions also yield moderate reductions in depressive symptoms (d = 0.59 versus d = 0.61 SD units), and dropout rates were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Available pharmacotherapy and behavioral interventions are reasonably effective. Given the higher average treatment effects of pharmacological interventions, pharmacotherapy may be the first choice of treatment as long as medical conditions and patients' preferences do not preclude this form of treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To reduce the morbidity attributable to anxiety disorders in old age and to improve the quality of care, data on the effectiveness of current treatments are needed. METHODS: A comparative meta-analysis of 32 studies of treatments focused on anxiety disorders in older adults (N = 2,484) receiving behavioral interventions or pharmacotherapy was conducted. RESULTS: In separate analyses of the effects of interventions, stronger improvements of anxiety symptoms are found in pharmacotherapy than in behavioral interventions (d = 1.76 versus d = 0.81 SD units). This difference disappears when computing effect sizes that control for nonspecific change in the control group (d = 0.80 and d = 0.83 SD units) because effect sizes are greater in pill-placebo controls of pharmacological studies than in control groups (e.g., wait list) of behavioral interventions (d = 1.06 versus d = 0.10 SD units). Both interventions also yield moderate reductions in depressive symptoms (d = 0.59 versus d = 0.61 SD units), and dropout rates were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Available pharmacotherapy and behavioral interventions are reasonably effective. Given the higher average treatment effects of pharmacological interventions, pharmacotherapy may be the first choice of treatment as long as medical conditions and patients' preferences do not preclude this form of treatment.
Authors: Emily Carl; Sara M Witcraft; Brooke Y Kauffman; Eilis M Gillespie; Eni S Becker; Pim Cuijpers; Michael Van Ameringen; Jasper A J Smits; Mark B Powers Journal: Cogn Behav Ther Date: 2019-02-14
Authors: Ashley S Roseman; Jeffrey A Cully; Mark E Kunik; Diane M Novy; Howard M Rhoades; Nancy L Wilson; Amber L Bush; Melinda A Stanley Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Jessica S Calleo; Amber L Bush; Jeffrey A Cully; Nancy L Wilson; Cynthia Kraus-Schuman; Howard M Rhoades; Diane M Novy; Nicholas Masozera; Susan Williams; Matthew Horsfield; Mark E Kunik; Melinda A Stanley Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Julie Loebach Wetherell; Andrew J Petkus; Steven R Thorp; Murray B Stein; Denise A Chavira; Laura Campbell-Sills; Michelle G Craske; Cathy Sherbourne; Alexander Bystritsky; Greer Sullivan; Peter Roy-Byrne Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Carmen Andreescu; Bea Herbeck Belnap; Bruce L Rollman; Patricia Houck; Caroline Ciliberti; Sati Mazumdar; M Katherine Shear; Eric J Lenze Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Melinda A Stanley; Nancy L Wilson; Diane M Novy; Howard M Rhoades; Paula D Wagener; Anthony J Greisinger; Jeffrey A Cully; Mark E Kunik Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Martin A Katzman; Pierre Bleau; Pierre Blier; Pratap Chokka; Kevin Kjernisted; Michael Van Ameringen; Martin M Antony; Stéphane Bouchard; Alain Brunet; Martine Flament; Sophie Grigoriadis; Sandra Mendlowitz; Kieron O'Connor; Kiran Rabheru; Peggy M A Richter; Melisa Robichaud; John R Walker Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 3.630