Literature DB >> 17670757

Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

J Dunning1, R J Graham, J Thambyrajah, M J Stewart, S W H Kendall, S Hunter.   

Abstract

AIMS: We sought to assess the haemodynamic profile of the Freedom stentless aortic valve compared with a stented bioprosthesis in a randomized controlled trial using echocardiography. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Sixty patients (mean age 73 years) undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) were randomized to either Sorin Freedom stentless (n=31) or Sorin More stented (n=29) valves. The primary endpoints were left ventricular mass index (LVMI) reduction at 6 and 12-months. We also assessed post-operative effective orifice area index (EOAI), aortic gradient and operative time. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. The stentless valve was associated with a lower post-operative gradient [PG 17 (12) vs. 31 (13) mmHg, P<0.0001] and greater EOAI [1.1 (0.3) vs. 0.8 (0.2) cm2/m2, P<0.0001]. A highly significant reduction in LVMI occurred by 6 months in both groups, but LVMI was significantly lower in the stentless group [LVMI 119 (39) vs. 135 (30) g/m2, P=0.05]. However, there was continued regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in the stented but not in the stentless group, resulting in no significant difference in LVMI at 12 months [119 (36) vs. 126 (31) g/m2, P=0.42].
CONCLUSION: The use of the Sorin Freedom stentless bioprosthesis for AVR results in lower PG and greater EOA when compared with a Sorin More stented valve. This is associated with earlier regression of LVH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17670757     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  4 in total

Review 1.  Exercise hemodynamics in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Anna M Booher; David S Bach
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated stentless aortic bioroots.

Authors:  Davut Cekmecelioglu; Ourania Preventza; Kathryn G Dougherty; Subhasis Chatterjee; Susan Y Green; Guilherme V Silva; Jose G Díez; Joseph S Coselli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

Review 3.  Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update.

Authors:  Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2011-06-02

4.  A propensity matched analysis of outcomes and long term survival in stented versus stentless valves.

Authors:  Blake N Shultz; Tomasz Timek; Alan T Davis; John Heiser; Edward Murphy; Charles Willekes; Robert Hooker
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 1.637

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.