Literature DB >> 17670486

Is skeletonised internal mammary harvest better than pedicled internal mammary harvest for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?

Ali Asgar Behranwala1, Shahzad G Raja, Joel Dunning.   

Abstract

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether skeletonised internal mammary artery (IMA) is better than pedicle IMA in coronary artery bypass grafting? Altogether 106 papers were found using the reported search, of which 12 presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that skeletonisation increases the length of conduit by around 3 cm and may also increase flow and conduit diameter. Skeletonisation should be the technique of choice for diabetics in whom BIMA harvest is desired, but at the expense of an extra 15-20 min per operation, no convincing outcome benefits have been shown for single IMA harvest.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 17670486     DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2005.118935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  2 in total

1.  Conduits for coronary bypass: internal thoracic artery.

Authors:  Hendrick B Barner
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-07

2.  A rare cadaveric case of a duplicated internal thoracic artery.

Authors:  Harry Nanthakumar; Joe Iwanaga; Aaron S Dumont; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2020-09-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.