Literature DB >> 17670301

Does ultrasound-guided central line insertion reduce complications and time to placement in elective patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Anthony Espinet1, Joel Dunning.   

Abstract

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether ultrasound probe central line placement reduced complications and time to placement in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Altogether, 193 papers were found from Medline using the reported search of which 6 papers presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses and comments were tabulated. We conclude that in patients with a potentially difficult central line insertion, the ultrasound technique reduces complications and time to insertion. However, in those patients where no difficulty is predicted, there is no evidence that the ultrasound technique confers any advantage.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 17670301     DOI: 10.1016/j.icvts.2004.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  3 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided central venous access.

Authors:  Paul Barash
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2009-08-26

2.  Ultrasound-guided insertion of pulmonary artery catheter: Case report.

Authors:  Raed A Alsatli
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2010-07-07

3.  Confirmation of endovenous placement of central catheter using the ultrasonographic "bubble test".

Authors:  Ajit S Baviskar; Khalid I Khatib; Sanjeev Bhoi; Sagar C Galwankar; Harshad C Dongare
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.