Literature DB >> 17669281

Talking to patients about screening colonoscopy--where conversations fall short.

Robin E Canada1, Barbara Turner.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A physician's recommendation is a powerful motivator for a patient to undergo colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening, yet little is known about how physicians address this topic.
METHODS: We recruited 30 primary care physicians and physicians-in-training from 4 practices to counsel a "patient," simulated by a researcher, regarding the need for screening colonoscopy. Audiotapes of the encounters were transcribed. Preserving physician anonymity, we assessed each encounter for key informational points, positive or negative message framing, type of numeracy information, and use of colloquial or technical language.
RESULTS: Most physicians (>/=80%) discussed the benefits of colorectal cancer screening, its status as a standard exploratory procedure, and the use of sedation. However, few (<20%) addressed the risks of colonoscopy, the nuances of scheduling, or the need for dietary and medication changes. Nearly all physicians (98%) used messages that focused on the positive aspects of screening, and many (67%) also used messages that focused on the risk of not screening. Numeracy information generally was expressed simply, but half of physicians used statistical terms. Half used colloquial terms to describe the prep and procedure.
CONCLUSION: Though most physicians used positive, simple terms to describe colonoscopy, they often omitted key information. Correcting for the areas of insufficient information found in our study--perhaps with supplementary educational sources--will help ensure that patients are adequately prepared for colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17669281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  5 in total

1.  Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Carrie N Klabunde; Stephen Taplin; Gigi Yuan; David Ransohoff; Sarah Kobrin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support.

Authors:  Barbara J Turner; Mark Weiner; Sheila D Berry; Karen Lillie; Kevin Fosnocht; Christopher S Hollenbeak
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Primary care colorectal cancer screening recommendation patterns: associated factors and screening outcomes.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; Elizabeth G Liles; David H Smith; Ana G Rosales; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer E Lafata; Ronald E Myers; David M Mosen; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Lack of follow-up after fecal occult blood testing in older adults: inappropriate screening or failure to follow up?

Authors:  Charlotte M Carlson; Katharine A Kirby; Michele A Casadei; Melissa R Partin; Christine E Kistler; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-10-11

5.  Behind closed doors: physician-patient discussions about colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; L Kay Bartholomew; Anthony J Greisinger; Gilda G Medina; Sarah T Hawley; Paul Haidet; Judith L Bettencourt; Navkiran K Shokar; Bruce S Ling; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.128

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.