Literature DB >> 17669144

Feminizing genitoplasty in adult transsexuals: early and long-term surgical results.

Jonathan C Goddard1, Richard M Vickery, Assad Qureshi, Duncan J Summerton, Deenesh Khoosal, Tim R Terry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the early and late surgical outcomes of feminizing genitoplasty (FG) in adult transsexuals in a UK single surgeon practice over a 10-year period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Computerized and manual databases were searched over the period 1994-2004 to identify patients who had undergone male to female FG. Case-notes were retrieved and analysed to identify epidemiological data, the number and type of perioperative problems, early results at outpatient review, late occurring problems and patient satisfaction. A telephone questionnaire was then conducted targeting all FG patients in our series. The questions were directed at identifying surgical complications, outcome and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: In all, 233 case-notes were identified and 222 (95%) were retrieved. All patients had penectomy, urethroplasty and labiaplasty, 207 (93%) had formation of a neoclitoris, and 202 (91%) had a skin-lined neovagina. The median (range) age was 41 (19-76) years. The median hospital stay was 10 (6-21) days. A record of the first outpatient visit was available in 197 (84.5%) cases. The median time to follow up was 56 (8-351) days. Over all, 82.2% had an adequate vaginal depth, with a median depth of 13 (5-15) cm and 6.1% had developed vaginal stenosis. Three (1.7%) patients had had a vaginal prolapse, two (1.1%) had a degree of vaginal skin flap necrosis and one (0.6%) was troubled with vaginal hair growth. In 86.3% of the patients the neoclitorizes were sensitive. There was urethral stenosis in 18.3% of the patients and 5.6% complained of spraying of urine. Minor corrective urethral surgery was undertaken in 36 patients including 42 urethral dilatations, and eight meatotomies were performed. At the first clinic visit 174 (88.3%) patients were 'happy', 13 (6.6%) were 'unhappy' and 10 (5.1%) made no comment. Of the 233 patients, we successfully contacted 70 (30%). All had had penectomy and labioplasty, 64 (91%) had a clitoroplasty and 62 (89%) a neovagina. The median age was 43 (19-76) years and the median follow up was 36 (9-96) months. Overall, 63 (98%) had a sensate neoclitoris, with 31 (48%) able to achieve orgasm; nine (14%) were hypersensitive. Vaginal depth was considered adequate by 38 (61%) and 14 (23%) had or were having regular intercourse. Vaginal hair growth troubled 18 (29%), four (6%) had a vaginal prolapse and two (3%) had vaginal necrosis. Urinary problems were reported by 19 (27%) patients, of these 18 (26%) required revision surgery, 14 (20%) complained of urinary spraying, 18 (26%) had an upward directed stream and 16 (23%) had urethral stenosis. The patients deemed the cosmetic result acceptable in 53 (76%) cases and 56 (80%) said the surgery met with their expectations.
CONCLUSION: This is largest series of early results after male to female FG. Complications are common after this complex surgery and long-term follow-up is difficult, as patients tend to re-locate at the start of their 'new life' after FG. There were good overall cosmetic and functional results, with a sustained high patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17669144     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07017.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  21 in total

1.  An unusual cause of vaginal discharge following gender reassignment.

Authors:  S Sukumaran; P A Moran; A Makar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-07-25

2.  [Surgical gender reassignment in the elderly].

Authors:  R Rossi Neto; F Vom Dorp; M Schenck; H Rübben; J Hess
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Male-to-female transsexualism. Sex reassignment surgery from a biopsychosocial perspective].

Authors:  Andreas Baranyi; Dominique Piber; Hans-Bernd Rothenhäusler
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009

4.  Conservatively treated perforation of the neovagina in a male to female transsexual patient.

Authors:  Ilda Amirian; Ismail Gögenur; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2011-02-02

Review 5.  The Perioperative Care of the Transgender Patient.

Authors:  Luis Etienne Tollinche; Chasity Burrows Walters; Asa Radix; Michael Long; Larissa Galante; Zil Garner Goldstein; Yvonne Kapinos; Cindy Yeoh
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Satisfaction with male-to-female gender reassignment surgery.

Authors:  Jochen Hess; Roberto Rossi Neto; Leo Panic; Herbert Rübben; Wolfgang Senf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 7.  Urethral complications after gender reassignment surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  N Nassiri; M Maas; M Basin; G E Cacciamani; L R Doumanian
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  Needs and concerns of transgender individuals regarding interdisciplinary transgender healthcare: A non-clinical online survey.

Authors:  Jana Eyssel; Andreas Koehler; Arne Dekker; Susanne Sehner; Timo O Nieder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  An overview of neovaginal reconstruction options in male to female transsexuals.

Authors:  Marta Bizic; Vladimir Kojovic; Dragana Duisin; Dusan Stanojevic; Svetlana Vujovic; Aleksandar Milosevic; Gradimir Korac; Miroslav L Djordjevic
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-05-26

10.  Laser hair removal for genital gender affirming surgery.

Authors:  William R Zhang; Giorgia L Garrett; Sarah T Arron; Maurice M Garcia
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.