Literature DB >> 17668966

Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar ridge augmentation using bone grafts and titanium micromesh in humans.

Giuseppe Corinaldesi1, Francesco Pieri, Claudio Marchetti, Milena Fini, Nicolò Nicoli Aldini, Roberto Giardino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, the use of titanium micromesh for alveolar bone augmentation has drawn interest; however, only limited histologic data are available on the quality of the bone regenerated. Therefore, this study compared the use of 100% intraoral autogenous bone to a combination of intraoral autogenous bone (70%) and bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM) (30%) for alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium micromesh histologically and histomorphometrically.
METHODS: Twelve partially edentulous patients required alveolar bone augmentation before implant insertion because of ridge resorption. The defect sites, six in the maxilla and six in the mandible, were reconstructed with particulate autologous bone (control group, N = 6) or a mixture of autologous bone and BPBM (test group, N = 6) in combination with titanium micromesh. Core biopsies were taken from the defect sites 8 to 9 months after grafting at the time of implant insertion.
RESULTS: Newly formed compact bone with a well-organized lamellar pattern was identified in all specimens. In the samples taken from the test group, the BPBM particles were surrounded completely by newly formed bone with no signs of resorption. The mean total bone volume was 62.38% +/- 13.02% in the control group and 52.88% +/- 11.47% in the test group. The soft tissue volume was 37.61% +/- 13.02% and 29.96% +/- 12.58%, respectively, and the residual BPBM volume was 17.15% +/- 2.72% in the test group. No statistical difference was observed in the histologic parameters evaluated, irrespective of graft type and site (P >0.05).
CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this study, BPBM (30%) in combination with autogenous bone (70%) did not yield a lower percentage of new bone formed compared to autogenous bone alone in ridge augmentation with titanium micromesh.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17668966     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.070001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  10 in total

Review 1.  Bone augmentation with TiMesh. autologous bone versus autologous bone and bone substitutes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Fabrizio Carini; Salvatore Longoni; Ernesto Amosso; Jacopo Paleari; Stefania Carini; Gianluca Porcaro
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-10-25

2.  Acellular mineralized allogenic block bone graft does not remodel during the 10 weeks following concurrent implant placement in a rabbit femoral model.

Authors:  D Joshua Cohen; Kayla M Scott; Aniket N Kulkarni; Jennifer S Wayne; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Preliminary evaluation of a three-dimensional, customized, and preformed titanium mesh in peri-implant alveolar bone regeneration.

Authors:  Gyu-Un Jung; Jae-Yun Jeon; Kyung-Gyun Hwang; Chang-Joo Park
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-26

4.  Alveolar ridge augmentation using chin bone graft, bovine bone mineral, and titanium mesh: Clinical, histological, and histomorphomtric study.

Authors:  Jihad Khamees; Mohammad Atef Darwiche; Nabil Kochaji
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-04

5.  Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation in anterior maxilla using autograft, xenograft and titanium mesh with simultaneous placement of endosseous implants.

Authors:  Sudhendra Deshpande; Jeevanand Deshmukh; Sumeet Deshpande; Richa Khatri; Shubha Deshpande
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2014-09

6.  Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using a Titanium Mesh: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Khalid Bahaa-Eldin; Basma Mostafa; Sherine Nasry; Ahmed Reda; Mona Shoeib
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-12

Review 7.  Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: A systematic review.

Authors:  P Gual-Vaqués; C Polis-Yanes; A Estrugo-Devesa; R Ayuso-Montero; A Mari-Roig; J López-López
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-01-01

Review 8.  The use of platelet rich plasma, bone morphogenetic protein-2 and different scaffolds in oral and maxillofacial surgery - literature review in comparison with own clinical experience.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Schuckert; Stefan Jopp; Magdalena Osadnik
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2011-04-01

9.  The Mechanical Properties and Biometrical Effect of 3D Preformed Titanium Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration on Alveolar Bone Defect.

Authors:  So-Hyoun Lee; Jong-Hoon Moon; Chang-Mo Jeong; Eun-Bin Bae; Chung-Eun Park; Gye-Rok Jeon; Jin-Ju Lee; Young-Chan Jeon; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  A Preshaped Titanium Mesh for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Equine-Derived Bone Graft in a Posterior Mandibular Bone Defect: A Case Report.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Gianbattista Greco; Enrico Gherlone
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.