UNLABELLED: The purpose of donor evaluation for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is to discover medical conditions that could increase the donor postoperative risk of complications and to determine whether the donor can yield a suitable graft for the recipient. We report the outcomes of LDLT donor candidates evaluated in a large multicenter study of LDLT. The records of all donor candidates and their respective recipients between 1998 and 2003 were reviewed as part of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL). The outcomes of the evaluation were recorded along with demographic data on the donors and recipients. Of the 1011 donor candidates evaluated, 405 (40%) were accepted for donation. The donor characteristics associated with acceptance (P < 0.05) were younger age, lower body mass index, and biological or spousal relationship to the recipient. Recipient characteristics associated with donor acceptance were younger age, lower Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, and shorter time from listing to first donor evaluation. Other predictors of donor acceptance included earlier year of evaluation and transplant center. CONCLUSION: Both donor and recipient features appear to affect acceptance for LDLT. These findings may aid the donor evaluation process and allow an objective assessment of the likelihood of donor candidate acceptance.
UNLABELLED: The purpose of donor evaluation for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is to discover medical conditions that could increase the donor postoperative risk of complications and to determine whether the donor can yield a suitable graft for the recipient. We report the outcomes of LDLT donor candidates evaluated in a large multicenter study of LDLT. The records of all donor candidates and their respective recipients between 1998 and 2003 were reviewed as part of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL). The outcomes of the evaluation were recorded along with demographic data on the donors and recipients. Of the 1011 donor candidates evaluated, 405 (40%) were accepted for donation. The donor characteristics associated with acceptance (P < 0.05) were younger age, lower body mass index, and biological or spousal relationship to the recipient. Recipient characteristics associated with donor acceptance were younger age, lower Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, and shorter time from listing to first donor evaluation. Other predictors of donor acceptance included earlier year of evaluation and transplant center. CONCLUSION: Both donor and recipient features appear to affect acceptance for LDLT. These findings may aid the donor evaluation process and allow an objective assessment of the likelihood of donor candidate acceptance.
Authors: J Moss; D Lapointe-Rudow; J F Renz; M Kinkhabwala; L M Dove; P J Gaglio; J C Emond; R S Brown Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Kim M Olthoff; Robert M Merion; Rafik M Ghobrial; Michael M Abecassis; Jeffrey H Fair; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; Igal Kam; Timothy L Pruett; James E Everhart; Tempie E Hulbert-Shearon; Brenda W Gillespie; Jean C Emond Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Elizabeth C Verna; Kristel H Hunt; John F Renz; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Sylvia Hafliger; Lorna M Dove; Milan Kinkhabwala; Jean C Emond; Robert S Brown Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: M E Rinella; E Alonso; S Rao; P Whitington; J Fryer; M Abecassis; R Superina; S L Flamm; A T Blei Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Carl L Berg; Brenda W Gillespie; Robert M Merion; Robert S Brown; Michael M Abecassis; James F Trotter; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; R Mark Ghobrial; Abraham Shaked; Jeffrey H Fair; James E Everhart Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2007-09-14 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Eric S Orman; Maria E Mayorga; Stephanie B Wheeler; Rachel M Townsley; Hector H Toro-Diaz; Paul H Hayashi; A Sidney Barritt Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.799