Literature DB >> 17667734

Predictors of treatment duration and retention in a study of long-term dynamic psychotherapy: childhood adversity, adult personality, and diagnosis.

J Christopher Perry1, Michael Bond, Carmella Roy.   

Abstract

Systematic knowledge about patient characteristics that predict the duration of long-term psychotherapy is largely absent. We examined predictors of attrition, retention, and duration of long-term dynamic psychotherapy to delineate the naturalistic history of psychotherapy, specifically focusing on childhood emotional neglect and abuse, adult diagnosis, personality, and functioning as predictors. Fifty-three adults with depressive, anxiety, and/or personality disorders (PDs) were offered at least 3 years of long-term dynamic psychotherapy. The median duration of therapy for the study group was 110 sessions (95% confidence interval [CI] 52-141). Nondynamic characteristics (including demographics; most Axis I diagnoses; depression, anxiety, and distress scores; social and global functioning; and the five personality factors) did not predict number of sessions. Dysthymic disorder, presence of any PD (particularly dependent PD [DPD]), emotional neglect in childhood, and higher adaptive defense style scores predicted a greater number of sessions, while obsessive-compulsive PD (OCPD) predicted fewer sessions. Emotional neglect, DPD, higher adaptive defenses, and OCPD were each unique predictors of duration. A session frequency less than 0.7 sessions per week (36 sessions per year) was associated with a three-fold higher risk for intrinsic attrition (relative risk = 3.04, 95% CI 1.10-8.44). Childhood emotional neglect as well as adult dependency may predispose patients to remain in therapy for longer durations, while some adaptive defenses may allow patients to contain the distressing affects that might otherwise lead to early termination. It remains to be seen whether longer durations of treatments are associated with respectively greater improvement, other things being equal, and whether these findings generalize to other types of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17667734     DOI: 10.1097/01.pra.0000281482.11946.fc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract        ISSN: 1527-4160            Impact factor:   1.325


  3 in total

Review 1.  Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder: a current review.

Authors:  Alice Diedrich; Ulrich Voderholzer
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Protocol for the MATCH study (Mindfulness and Tai Chi for cancer health): A preference-based multi-site randomized comparative effectiveness trial (CET) of Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR) vs. Tai Chi/Qigong (TCQ) for cancer survivors.

Authors:  Linda E Carlson; Erin L Zelinski; Michael Speca; Lynda G Balneaves; Jennifer M Jones; Daniel Santa Mina; Peter M Wayne; Tavis S Campbell; Janine Giese-Davis; Peter Faris; Jennifer Zwicker; Kamala Patel; Tara L Beattie; Steve Cole; Kirsti Toivonen; Jill Nation; Philip Peng; Bruce Thong; Raimond Wong; Sunita Vohra
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  What Works for Whom: Patients' Psychological Resources and Vulnerabilities as Common and Specific Predictors of Working Alliance in Different Psychotherapies.

Authors:  Erkki Heinonen; Paul Knekt; Olavi Lindfors
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.435

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.