Literature DB >> 17667478

3-year follow-up of the NIMH MTA study.

Peter S Jensen, L Eugene Arnold, James M Swanson, Benedetto Vitiello, Howard B Abikoff, Laurence L Greenhill, Lily Hechtman, Stephen P Hinshaw, William E Pelham, Karen C Wells, C Keith Conners, Glen R Elliott, Jeffery N Epstein, Betsy Hoza, John S March, Brooke S G Molina, Jeffrey H Newcorn, Joanne B Severe, Timothy Wigal, Robert D Gibbons, Kwan Hur.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the intent-to-treat analysis of the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With ADHD (MTA), the effects of medication management (MedMgt), behavior therapy (Beh), their combination (Comb), and usual community care (CC) differed at 14 and 24 months due to superiority of treatments that used the MTA medication algorithm (Comb+MedMgt) over those that did not (Beh+CC). This report examines 36-month outcomes, 2 years after treatment by the study ended.
METHOD: For primary outcome measures (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD] and oppositional defiant disorder [ODD] symptoms, social skills, reading scores, impairment, and diagnostic status), mixed-effects regression models and orthogonal contrasts examined 36-month outcomes.
RESULTS: At 3 years, 485 of the original 579 subjects (83.8%) participated in the follow-up, now at ages 10 to 13 years, (mean 11.9 years). In contrast to the significant advantage of MedMgt+Comb over Beh+CC for ADHD symptoms at 14 and 24 months, treatment groups did not differ significantly on any measure at 36 months. The percentage of children taking medication >50% of the time changed between 14 and 36 months across the initial treatment groups: Beh significantly increased (14% to 45%), MedMed+Comb significantly decreased (91% to 71%), and CC remained constant (60%-62%). Regardless of their treatment use changes, all of the groups showed symptom improvement over baseline. Notably, initial symptom severity, sex (male), comorbidity, public assistance, and parental psychopathology (ADHD) did not moderate children's 36-month treatment responses, but these factors predicted worse outcomes over 36 months, regardless of original treatment assignment.
CONCLUSIONS: By 36 months, the earlier advantage of having had 14 months of the medication algorithm was no longer apparent, possibly due to age-related decline in ADHD symptoms, changes in medication management intensity, starting or stopping medications altogether, or other factors not yet evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17667478     DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3180686d48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 0890-8567            Impact factor:   8.829


  165 in total

1.  Using Best-Worst Scaling to Measure Caregiver Preferences for Managing their Child's ADHD: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Susan dosReis; Xinyi Ng; Emily Frosch; Gloria Reeves; Charles Cunningham; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Parent training interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years.

Authors:  Morris Zwi; Hannah Jones; Camilla Thorgaard; Ann York; Jane A Dennis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

3.  Pharmacotherapy for parents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): impact on maternal ADHD and parenting.

Authors:  Andrea Chronis-Tuscano; Mark A Stein
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Individual and combined effects of physical exercise and methylphenidate on orienting behavior and social interaction in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Authors:  Andrea M Robinson; David J Bucci
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Using a Brief Parent-Report Measure to Track Outcomes for Children and Teens with ADHD.

Authors:  Alyssa McCarthy; Sunna Asghar; Timothy Wilens; Stephanie Romo; Hayley Kamin; Michael Jellinek; Michael Murphy
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2016-06

6.  Extended-release medications for children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  M Feldman; S Bélanger
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Developmental progression to early adult binge drinking and marijuana use from worsening versus stable trajectories of adolescent attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and delinquency.

Authors:  Andrea L Howard; Brooke S G Molina; James M Swanson; Stephen P Hinshaw; Katherine A Belendiuk; Seth C Harty; L Eugene Arnold; Howard B Abikoff; Lily Hechtman; Annamarie Stehli; Laurence L Greenhill; Jeffrey H Newcorn; Timothy Wigal
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 8.  Personal reflections on observational and experimental research approaches to childhood psychopathology.

Authors:  Judith L Rapoport
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 8.982

9.  Adolescent substance use in the multimodal treatment study of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (MTA) as a function of childhood ADHD, random assignment to childhood treatments, and subsequent medication.

Authors:  Brooke S G Molina; Stephen P Hinshaw; L Eugene Arnold; James M Swanson; William E Pelham; Lily Hechtman; Betsy Hoza; Jeffery N Epstein; Timothy Wigal; Howard B Abikoff; Laurence L Greenhill; Peter S Jensen; Karen C Wells; Benedetto Vitiello; Robert D Gibbons; Andrea Howard; Patricia R Houck; Kwan Hur; Bo Lu; Sue Marcus
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 8.829

10.  Parenting as a Mechanism of Change in Psychosocial Treatment for Youth with ADHD, Predominantly Inattentive Presentation.

Authors:  Lauren M Haack; Miguel Villodas; Keith McBurnett; Stephen Hinshaw; Linda J Pfiffner
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2017-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.