Literature DB >> 17666993

Measuring key integration outcomes: a case study of a large urban health center.

Esther Suter1, Melissa Hyman, Nelly Oelke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care reform, through innovative health delivery systems, has been a high priority to address staff shortages, increasingly complex care needs of the aging population, and fragmentation of care. Community health centers have been promoted as one service delivery model with large potential for integration and collaboration. The South Calgary Health Centre (SCHC) opened in June 2004 with the mandate to provide a new model for accessible, accountable, integrated, and community-based health services.
PURPOSE: The primary objective was to determine the performance of the SCHC; and further, to establish the value of the evaluation framework used in measuring organizational performance of an integrated service delivery model.
METHODOLOGY: Multiple stakeholders were involved in the evaluation in a utilization-focused, participatory way. A comprehensive evaluation framework was developed and implemented to assess the performance of the SCHC at system, provider, and patient levels. Functional, clinical, and community integration were key systems outcomes within this framework. Case-study methodology with mixed methods drawing on multiple data sources (both qualitative and quantitative) was used.
FINDINGS: The evaluation findings suggest that the center is functioning well and that staff and client satisfaction are high. Although the model has not achieved all that was originally intended (i.e., fully realized clinical integration), participants felt that the model has been successful and has great potential for integration. The comprehensive evaluation framework developed for this project proved useful in assessing different aspects of integration as well as provider and client perceptions of the center's performance. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Evaluation findings and recommendations have been used to inform operations at the SCHC and for the planning of future health centers. The evaluation framework may help to standardize evaluation approaches across projects and can be used for monitoring progress of the SCHC as well as future evaluations of integrated service delivery models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17666993     DOI: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000281624.43611.dd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev        ISSN: 0361-6274


  9 in total

Review 1.  Ten key principles for successful health systems integration.

Authors:  Esther Suter; Nelly D Oelke; Carol E Adair; Gail D Armitage
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2009

2.  Health systems integration: state of the evidence.

Authors:  Gail D Armitage; Esther Suter; Nelly D Oelke; Carol E Adair
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.120

3.  Instruments to assess integrated care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anne Marie Lyngsø; Nina Skavlan Godtfredsen; Dorte Høst; Anne Frølich
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 5.120

4.  Delivering Integrated Care to the Frail Elderly: The Impact on Professionals' Objective Burden and Job Satisfaction.

Authors:  Benjamin Janse; Robbert Huijsman; Ruben Dennis Maurice de Kuyper; Isabelle Natalina Fabbricotti
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.120

5.  Inter-Sectoral Collaboration in Municipal Health Centres: A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Supporting Organizational Elements and Individual Drivers.

Authors:  Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard; Christian Elling Scheele; Karsten Vrangbæk
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.120

6.  Exploring the psychometric properties of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care measurement tool for care providers in Australia.

Authors:  Julian Fares; Kon Shing Kenneth Chung; Megan Passey; Jo Longman; Pim P Valentijn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Development of a minimization instrument for allocation of a hospital-level performance improvement intervention to reduce waiting times in Ontario emergency departments.

Authors:  Chad Andrew Leaver; Astrid Guttmann; Merrick Zwarenstein; Brian H Rowe; Geoff Anderson; Therese Stukel; Brian Golden; Robert Bell; Dante Morra; Howard Abrams; Michael J Schull
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Integration of primary health services: being put together does not mean they will work together.

Authors:  Sharon Lawn; Andrea Lloyd; Alison King; Linda Sweet; Lyn Gum
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-01-30

Review 9.  Integrated Cancer Screening Performance Indicators: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Silvina C Mema; Huiming Yang; Marcus Vaska; Sherry Elnitsky; Zhichang Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.