Literature DB >> 17666926

A randomized trial to assess the efficacy of point-of-care testing in decreasing length of stay in a pediatric emergency department.

Allen L Hsiao1, Karen A Santucci, James Dziura, M Douglas Baker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of point-of-care (POC) testing versus traditional laboratory methods on length of stay in a pediatric emergency department (ED).
METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of patients solely requiring blood work that a POC device was capable of performing. Two hundred twenty-five patients presenting to a tertiary hospital ED in an urban setting enrolled after informed consent. Of all patients studied, 114 were randomized to the POC group, 111 to routine laboratory analysis. Exact times of critical phases of management and patient flow were recorded by dedicated research assistants. Medical management decisions were made at the discretion of the supervising physicians.
RESULTS: Similar waiting periods were noted in both groups for time spent in the waiting room, time waiting for first physician contact, and time waiting for blood draw. Significantly less time was required for results to become available to physicians when POC testing was used (65.0 minutes; P < 0.001). Significant decrease in overall length of stay was also noted, with patients randomized to the POC group spending an average of 38.5 minutes (P < 0.001) less time in the ED.
CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care testing can significantly decrease the length of stay in select pediatric patients in an ED setting. Point-of-care devices may prove to facilitate patient flow during busiest periods of service demand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17666926     DOI: 10.1097/01.pec.0000280506.44924.de

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  7 in total

1.  Numerical parameters and quality indicators in a medical emergency department.

Authors:  Harald Dormann; Katharina Diesch; Thomas Ganslandt; Eckhardt G Hahn
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Evaluation of the bedside Quikread go® CRP test in the management of febrile infants at the emergency department.

Authors:  S Hernández-Bou; V Trenchs; M I Vanegas; A F Valls; C Luaces
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Percentage of US emergency department patients seen within the recommended triage time: 1997 to 2006.

Authors:  Leora I Horwitz; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-09

Review 4.  Multi-dimensional Measurements of Crowding for Pediatric Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Areej Abudan; Roland C Merchant
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2021-02-27

5.  Accuracy and feasibility of point-of-care white blood cell count and C-reactive protein measurements at the pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Lauri Ivaska; Jussi Niemelä; Pia Leino; Jussi Mertsola; Ville Peltola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Bedside ABG, electrolytes, lactate and procalcitonin in emergency pediatrics.

Authors:  Prerna Batra; Ajeet Kumar Dwivedi; Neha Thakur
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-07

7.  Impact of point-of-care panel tests in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Clare Goyder; Pui San Tan; Jan Verbakel; Thanusha Ananthakumar; Joseph J Lee; Gail Hayward; Philip J Turner; Ann Van Den Bruel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.