Literature DB >> 1766685

A comparison of clinical acuity and contrast sensitivity charts: effect of uncorrected myopia.

A Bradley1, J Hook, J Haeseker.   

Abstract

We have examined the effect of corrected and uncorrected myopia on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using a standard acuity chart and two commercially available printed contrast sensitivity charts (Vistech and Pelli-Robson). We tested 140 eyes of 70 young adults. Most subjects were myopic and were tested with and without their optimum spectacle or contact lens correction. We found no effect of myopia, if well corrected, on acuity or contrast sensitivity. All three test scores were sensitive to uncorrected myopia. The Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart, which was designed to be insensitive to defocus, required more than three diopters of refractive error to elicit a two line change in performance, and it was generally very insensitive to uncorrected myopia. Although the Vistech chart was sensitive to uncorrected myopia, the large step sizes used in the chart, and the higher inter- and intra-subject variability in scores reduces its potential value for refraction. The Snellen letter chart gave the most sensitive and reliable changes in performance with uncorrected myopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1766685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  9 in total

1.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jongsoo Baek; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  qCSF in clinical application: efficient characterization and classification of contrast sensitivity functions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Luis Lesmes; Li-Xia Feng; Liming Tao; Yi-Feng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The Effects of Spatial Frequency on the Accommodative Responses of Myopic and Emmetropic Chinese Children.

Authors:  Jingjing Xu; Xin Lu; Zhili Zheng; Jinhua Bao; Nisha Singh; Björn Drobe; Hao Chen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Intersubject variability of foveal cone photoreceptor density in relation to eye length.

Authors:  Kaccie Y Li; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.925

5.  Gradiate: A radial sweep approach to measuring detailed contrast sensitivity functions from eye movements.

Authors:  Scott W J Mooney; Nazia M Alam; N Jeremy Hill; Glen T Prusky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Sensitivity and Stability of Functional Vision Tests in Detecting Subtle Changes Under Multiple Simulated Conditions.

Authors:  Zhipeng Chen; Yijing Zhuang; Zixuan Xu; Lily Y L Chan; Shenglan Zhang; Qingqing Ye; Lei Feng; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jinrong Li
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of contrast sensitivity functions in a within-subject design.

Authors:  Yukai Zhao; Luis Andres Lesmes; Fang Hou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Luis Andres Lesmes; Woojae Kim; Hairong Gu; Mark A Pitt; Jay I Myung; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The Effect of Simulated Visual Field Loss on Optokinetic Nystagmus.

Authors:  Soheil M Doustkouhi; Philip R K Turnbull; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.283

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.