Literature DB >> 17665263

Impact of familial adenomatous polyposis on young adults: quality of life outcomes.

L Andrews1, S Mireskandari, J Jessen, B Thewes, M Solomon, F Macrae, B Meiser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study used a novel questionnaire to assess quality of life and psychologic adjustment among young adults aged 18 to 35 years with a diagnosis of, or at risk of, developing familial adenomatous polyposis.
METHODS: Eighty-eight participants (25 males) were recruited through four Australian Hereditary Bowel Cancer Registries.
RESULTS: The average age of participants was 28 years, and the average age of these participants at the time of their last genetic consultation was 23 years. Seventy-one participants (81 percent) had clinical familial adenomatous polyposis, of whom 57 had undergone an ileorectal anastomosis or formation of an ileal pouch with anal anastomosis to prevent colorectal cancer. The ileal-pouch-with-anal-anastomosis group had significantly more adverse outcomes for physical functioning, body image, sexual impact, and negative affect compared with the no-surgery group -- and significantly more negative outcomes for physical functioning and negative affect compared with the ileorectal-anastomosis group. Among the total sample, a small proportion (11.4 percent) had avoidance scores indicative of a significant stress response, and being single was associated with higher levels of avoidance responses about familial adenomatous polyposis (z = -3.19; P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Familial adenomatous polyposis may have a negative impact across a broad range of life domains. Being single is an important risk factor for adverse psychologic outcomes. Delaying surgery, especially ileal pouch with anal anastomosis may minimize the negative impact on physical and psychologic functioning. Referral for psychologic intervention may be required for a small proportion of those affected by familial adenomatous polyposis, and ongoing access to genetic services may help to identify and address the needs of this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17665263     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-0259-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  6 in total

1.  Psychosocial impact of familial adenomatous polyposis on young adults: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shab Mireskandari; Jennifer Sangster; Bettina Meiser; Belinda Thewes; Claire Groombridge; Allan Spigelman; Lesley Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The challenge of developmentally appropriate care: predictive genetic testing in young people for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Rony E Duncan; Lynn Gillam; Julian Savulescu; Robert Williamson; John G Rogers; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  The FAP self-concept scale (adult form).

Authors:  Mary Jane Esplen; Noreen Stuckless; Terri Berk; Kate Butler; Steve Gallinger
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Can we test for hereditary cancer at 18 years when we start surveillance at 25? Patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Aisha S Sie; Judith B Prins; Liesbeth Spruijt; C Marleen Kets; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  CDH1 variants leading to gastric cancer risk management decision-making experiences in emerging adults: 'I am not ready yet'.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Kathleen Calzone; Grace-Ann Fasaye; John Quillin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.717

6.  Prophylactic colectomy and rectal preservation in FAP: systematic endoscopic follow-up and adenoma destruction changes natural history of polyposis.

Authors:  Arnaud Pasquer; Nicolas Benech; Mathieu Pioche; Antoine Breton; Jerome Rivory; Olivier Vinet; Gilles Poncet; Jean Christophe Saurin
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-06-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.