OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir when coadministered with tenofovir in HIV-1-infected adult patients. DESIGN: Forty adult HIV-1-infected patients received either atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once daily and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with (n = 20) or without (n = 20) tenofovir-disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir-DF) 300 mg once daily. Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetics were assessed after at least 2 weeks of therapy according to a standardised therapeutic drug monitoring protocol. METHODS: Atazanavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and the geometric means of minimum and maximum concentrations (C(min), C(max)), the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC), half-life (t(1/2)) and total clearance (CL(tot)) were subject to a matched pairs-analysis. Patients' pairs were matched for gender, ethnicity, weight and Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) status. RESULTS: The respective geometric means (90% CI) for atazanavir C(min), C(max) and AUC with tenfovir vs. without tenofovir were 405 (314-523) vs. 417 (304-572) ng/ml, 3,022 (2,493-3,664) vs. 2,817 (2,341-3,390) ng/ml and 34,822 (29,315-41,363) vs. 32,101 (26,206-39,321) ng x h/ml showing no significant differences between the groups. Atazanavir plasma concentrations measured at week 5 of therapy or later were lower than in the first 4 weeks (T-test for C(max), p = .080; AUC, p = .050 and CL(tot), p = .051). CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of tenofovir-DF did not impair the plasma concentrations of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in a pharmacokinetic analysis of patient pairs matched for gender, ethnicity, weight and CDC status.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir when coadministered with tenofovir in HIV-1-infected adultpatients. DESIGN: Forty adult HIV-1-infectedpatients received either atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once daily and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with (n = 20) or without (n = 20) tenofovir-disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir-DF) 300 mg once daily. Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetics were assessed after at least 2 weeks of therapy according to a standardised therapeutic drug monitoring protocol. METHODS:Atazanavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and the geometric means of minimum and maximum concentrations (C(min), C(max)), the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC), half-life (t(1/2)) and total clearance (CL(tot)) were subject to a matched pairs-analysis. Patients' pairs were matched for gender, ethnicity, weight and Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) status. RESULTS: The respective geometric means (90% CI) for atazanavir C(min), C(max) and AUC with tenfovir vs. without tenofovir were 405 (314-523) vs. 417 (304-572) ng/ml, 3,022 (2,493-3,664) vs. 2,817 (2,341-3,390) ng/ml and 34,822 (29,315-41,363) vs. 32,101 (26,206-39,321) ng x h/ml showing no significant differences between the groups. Atazanavir plasma concentrations measured at week 5 of therapy or later were lower than in the first 4 weeks (T-test for C(max), p = .080; AUC, p = .050 and CL(tot), p = .051). CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of tenofovir-DF did not impair the plasma concentrations of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in a pharmacokinetic analysis of patient pairs matched for gender, ethnicity, weight and CDC status.
Authors: B Gazzard; A J Bernard; M Boffito; D Churchill; S Edwards; N Fisher; A M Geretti; M Johnson; C Leen; B Peters; A Pozniak; J Ross; J Walsh; E Wilkins; M Youle Journal: HIV Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Elke S Perloff; Su X Duan; Paul R Skolnik; David J Greenblatt; Lisa L von Moltke Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2005-03-11 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Esteban Ribera; Carlos Azuaje; Rosa M Lopez; Marjorie Diaz; Maria Feijoo; Leonor Pou; Manuel Crespo; Adria Curran; Imma Ocaña; Albert Pahissa Journal: AIDS Date: 2006-05-12 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Scott M Hammer; Michael S Saag; Mauro Schechter; Julio S G Montaner; Robert T Schooley; Donna M Jacobsen; Melanie A Thompson; Charles C J Carpenter; Margaret A Fischl; Brian G Gazzard; Jose M Gatell; Martin S Hirsch; David A Katzenstein; Douglas D Richman; Stefano Vella; Patrick G Yeni; Paul A Volberding Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-08-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Marta Boffito; Michael Kurowski; Guido Kruse; Andrew Hill; Andrew A Benzie; Mark R Nelson; Graeme J Moyle; Brian G Gazzard; Anton L Pozniak Journal: AIDS Date: 2004-06-18 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Wolfgang Stöhr; David Back; David Dunn; Caroline Sabin; Alan Winston; Richard Gilson; Deenan Pillay; Teresa Hill; Jonathan Ainsworth; Brian Gazzard; Clifford Leen; Loveleen Bansi; Martin Fisher; Chloe Orkin; Jane Anderson; Margaret Johnson; Philippa Easterbrook; Sara Gibbons; Saye Khoo Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Nils von Hentig; Pavel Kaykhin; Christoph Stephan; Errol Babacan; Martin Stürmer; Schlomo Staszewski; Jörn Lötsch Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2008-04-14 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Regis Kreitchmann; Brookie M Best; Jiajia Wang; Alice Stek; Edmund Caparelli; D Heather Watts; Elizabeth Smith; David E Shapiro; Steve Rossi; Sandra K Burchett; Elizabeth Hawkins; Mark Byroads; Tim R Cressey; Mark Mirochnick Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Annette Haberl; Manfred Moesch; Gabriele Nisius; Christoph Stephan; Markus Bickel; Pavel Khaykin; Michael Kurowski; Reinhard Brodt; Nils von Hentig Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 2.953