Literature DB >> 17664304

A NICE fallacy.

Muireann Quigley1.   

Abstract

A response is given to the claim by Claxton and Culyer, who stated that the policies of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) do not evaluate patients rather than treatments. The argument is made that the use of values such as quality of life and life-years is ethically dubious when used to choose which patients ought to receive treatments in the National Health Service (NHS).

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17664304      PMCID： PMC2598160          DOI： 10.1136/jme.2006.018556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN： 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

1.  NICE discrimination.

Authors:  M Rawlins; A Dillon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  It's not NICE to discriminate.

Authors:  John Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The relevance of health state after treatment in prioritising between different patients.

Authors:  E Nord
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Enhanced surveillance of invasive Haemophilus influenzae disease in England, 1990 to 1996: impact of conjugate vaccines.

Authors:  M P Slack; H J Azzopardi; R M Hargreaves; M E Ramsay
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 5.  Wickedness or folly? The ethics of NICE's decisions.

Authors:  K Claxton; A J Culyer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.903
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.