Literature DB >> 17664013

Size effect of elemental selenium nanoparticles (Nano-Se) at supranutritional levels on selenium accumulation and glutathione S-transferase activity.

Dungeng Peng1, Jinsong Zhang, Qingliang Liu, Ethan Will Taylor.   

Abstract

It has been shown that 36 nm Nano-Se has lower toxicity than selenite or selenomethionine, but these forms of selenium (Se) all possess similar ability to increase selenoenzyme levels. The size of nanoparticles plays an important role in their biological activity: as expected, 5-200 nm Nano-Se can directly scavenge free radicals in vitro in a size-dependent fashion. However, in Se-deficient cells and Se-deficient mice, the size effect of Nano-Se on increasing selenoenzymes and liver Se disappears unexpectedly. We hypothesize that under conditions of Se deficiency, the avidity of Se uptake mechanisms may be increased to maintain the biosynthesis of selenoenzymes, which are fundamental for redox homeostasis. This increased avidity may override the potential advantage of small size Nano-Se seen under Se-replete conditions, thereby eliminating the size effect. Once selenoenzymes have been saturated, Se uptake mechanisms may downregulate; accordingly, the size effect of Nano-Se can then reappear. To test this hypothesis, Se-deficient mice were administered either 36 or 90 nm Nano-Se at supranutritional doses, in both a short-term model and a single-dose model. Under these conditions, Nano-Se showed a size effect on Se accumulation and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity. A size effect of Nano-Se was found in 15 out of 18 total comparisons between sizes at the same dose and time in the two models. Furthermore, the magnitude of the size effect was more prominent on Se accumulation than on GST activity. GST is strictly regulated by transcriptional and translational mechanisms, so its increase in activity normally does not exceed 3-fold. In contrast, the homeostasis of Se accumulation is not as tightly controlled. In the present experiments, GST activity had reached or was approaching saturation, but liver Se was far below saturation. Therefore, our results strongly suggest that the saturation profile of the tested biomarker has an impact on the size effect of Nano-Se. Since both GST and small molecular weight selenocompounds accumulated in vivo are important intermediates for chemoprevention by Se, our results also suggest that Nano-Se should be most effective as a chemopreventive agent at smaller particle size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17664013     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Inorg Biochem        ISSN: 0162-0134            Impact factor:   4.155


  44 in total

1.  Neuro- and nephrotoxicity of subchronic cadmium chloride exposure and the potential chemoprotective effects of selenium nanoparticles.

Authors:  Kadry M Sadek; Mohamed A Lebda; Tarek K Abouzed; Sherif M Nasr; Moustafa Shoukry
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.584

2.  Reduction of selenite by Azospirillum brasilense with the formation of selenium nanoparticles.

Authors:  Anna V Tugarova; Elena P Vetchinkina; Ekaterina A Loshchinina; Andrei M Burov; Valentina E Nikitina; Alexander A Kamnev
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 3.  Metal-tolerant thermophiles: metals as electron donors and acceptors, toxicity, tolerance and industrial applications.

Authors:  Preeti Ranawat; Seema Rawat
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Reduction of organic and inorganic selenium compounds by the edible medicinal basidiomycete Lentinula edodes and the accumulation of elemental selenium nanoparticles in its mycelium.

Authors:  Elena Vetchinkina; Ekaterina Loshchinina; Viktor Kursky; Valentina Nikitina
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.422

5.  Aerobic biogenesis of selenium nanospheres by Bacillus cereus isolated from coalmine soil.

Authors:  Soniya Dhanjal; Swaranjit Singh Cameotra
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 5.328

6.  Effects of Supranutritional Selenium Nanoparticles on Immune and Antioxidant Capacity in Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Yuyue Jin; Yudan He; Lujie Liu; Wenjing Tao; Geng Wang; Wanjing Sun; Xun Pei; Zhiping Xiao; Haidong Wang; Minqi Wang
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  The prospective protective effect of selenium nanoparticles against chromium-induced oxidative and cellular damage in rat thyroid.

Authors:  Kamel M A Hassanin; Samraa H Abd El-Kawi; Khalid S Hashem
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-05-01

8.  Selenium Nanoparticles-Embedded Chitosan Microspheres and Their Effects Upon Alcohol-Induced Gastric Mucosal Injury in Rats: Rapid Preparation, Oral Delivery, and Gastroprotective Potential of Selenium Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Kaikai Bai; Bihong Hong; Ran Tan; Jianlin He; Zhuan Hong
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-02-19

9.  Effect of Glycine Nano-Selenium Supplementation on Production Performance, Egg Quality, Serum Biochemistry, Oxidative Status, and the Intestinal Morphology and Absorption of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Wenting Zhou; Sasa Miao; Mingkun Zhu; Xinyang Dong; Xiaoting Zou
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Cytotoxicity of selenium nanoparticles in rat dermal fibroblasts.

Authors:  Joseph F Ramos; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.