Literature DB >> 17662790

Impact of high thoracic epidural anesthesia on incidence of perioperative atrial fibrillation in off-pump coronary bypass grafting: a prospective randomized study.

Farhad Bakhtiary1, Panagiotis Therapidis, Omer Dzemali, Koray Ak, Hanns Ackermann, Dirk Meininger, Paul Kessler, Peter Kleine, Anton Moritz, Tayfun Aybek, Selami Dogan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of high thoracic epidural anesthesia on reduction of perioperative arrhythmia in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
METHODS: We prospectively randomized 132 patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary bypass grafting using either general anesthesia (GA) (n = 66) or combined general and high thoracic epidural anesthesia (GA+TEA) (n = 66). Incidence of perioperative arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation, serum epinephrine levels, heart rate variability, and hemodynamic parameters were compared between groups.
RESULTS: The incidence of perioperative dysarrhythmias was significantly lower (P < .01) in the GA+TEA group (3%) than in the GA group (23.7%). Intraoperative sinus bradycardia occurred in 91% of the patients in the GA+TEA group versus 5.3% in the GA group. After induction of anesthesia, the mean systolic arterial pressure decreased significantly from 128 +/- 5 to 92 +/- 4 mm Hg and the heart rate from 74 +/- 9 to 52 +/- 8 beats . min(-1) in the GA+TEA group, whereas in the GA group no significant hemodynamic changes were observed (P < .001). Serum epinephrine levels were significantly lower in the GA+TEA group (69 +/- 11 to 35 +/- 7 ng/dL) than in the GA group (72 +/- 9 to 70 +/- 9 ng/dL).
CONCLUSIONS: In our study cohort, high thoracic epidural anesthesia in combination with general anesthesia reduced significantly the incidence of perioperative arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, we observed a significant reduction of epinephrine serum levels in this patient group. The results of this study support a combination of general anesthesia with thoracic epidural anesthesia as a multidisciplinary approach, which may lead to a better patient outcome, improvement of early analgesia, and reduction of perioperative complications in off-pump coronary artery bypass procedures. The potential risks of thoracic epidural anesthesia during off-pump coronary artery bypass procedures should not be underestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17662790     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.03.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  8 in total

1.  Thoracic epidural anesthesia reverses sepsis-induced hepatic hyperperfusion and reduces leukocyte adhesion in septic rats.

Authors:  Hendrik Freise; Fritz Daudel; Christina Grosserichter; Stefan Lauer; Juergen Hinkelmann; Hugo K Van Aken; Andreas W Sielenkaemper; Martin Westphal; Lars G Fischer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  A randomized-controlled study of intrathecal versus epidural thoracic analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Sebastiano Mercadante; Patrizia Villari; Alessandra Casuccio; Antonio Marrazzo
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with ropivacaine and fentanyl in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Mikhail Y Kirov; Alexey V Eremeev; Alexey A Smetkin; Lars J Bjertnaes
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Epidural analgesia for adults undergoing cardiac surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-01

Review 5.  Thoracic epidural anesthesia improves outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shengsuo Zhang; Xinmin Wu; Hang Guo; Li Ma
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 6.  A Review of Current Analgesic Techniques in Cardiac Surgery. Is Epidural Worth it?

Authors:  Mohsen Ziyaeifard; Rasoul Azarfarin; Samad Ej Golzari
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2014-09-30

7.  A previously published propofol-remifentanil response surface model does not predict patient response well in video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Wang; Chien-Kun Ting; Jing-Yang Liou; Kun-Hui Chen; Mei-Young Tsou; Wen-Kuei Chang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of thoracic epidural anesthesia in preventing atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Wan-Jie Gu; Chun-Yin Wei; De-Qing Huang; Rui-Xing Yin
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.298

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.