Literature DB >> 17661932

Results of a survey of 5,700 patient monopolar radiofrequency facial skin tightening treatments: assessment of a low-energy multiple-pass technique leading to a clinical end point algorithm.

Jeffrey S Dover1, Brian Zelickson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Monopolar radiofrequency is an effective means of nonsurgical facial skin tightening.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether using larger tips at lower energy and multiple passes, using patient feedback on heat sensation and treating to a clinical end point of visible tightening, would yield better results than single passes with small tips at high energy, as measured by patient and physician satisfaction.
METHODS: Fourteen physicians from four specialties were surveyed to determine the answers to the following three questions. (1) Is patient's feedback on heat sensation a valid and preferred method for optimal energy selection? (2) Do multiple passes at moderate energy settings yield substantial and consistent efficacy? (3) Is treating to a clinical end point of visible tightening predictable of results?
RESULTS: A total of 5,700 patient treatments were surveyed. Comparisons were made using the original algorithm of high-energy, single pass to the new algorithm of lower energy and multiple passes with visible tightening as the end point of treatment. Using the original treatment algorithm, 26% of patients demonstrated immediate tightening, 54% observed skin tightening 6 months after treatment, 45% found the procedure too painful, and 68% of patients found the treatment results met their expectations. With the new multiple-pass algorithm, 87% observed immediate tightening, 92% had the tightening six months after treatment, 5% found the procedure too painful, while 94% found the treatment results met their expectations.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient feedback on heat sensation is a valid, preferable method for optimal energy selection in monopolar radiofrequency skin-tightening treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17661932     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33191.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  6 in total

1.  Update on tissue tightening.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2010-05

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Monopolar Radiofrequency for Treatment of Lower Facial Laxity in Asians.

Authors:  Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha; Yuri Yogya; Chadakan Yan; Phumithep Phumariyapong; Yanisorn Nanchaipruek; Panwadee Thongjaroensirikul; Pitchaya Maneeprasopchoke; Thanya Techapichetvanich; Sasima Eimpunth; Woraphong Manuskiatti
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-09-27

3.  Effect of Single-Session, Cryogen-Cooled Monopolar Radiofrequency Therapy on Sexual Function in Women with Vaginal Laxity: The VIVEVE I Trial.

Authors:  Michael Krychman; Christopher G Rowan; Bruce B Allan; Scott Durbin; Ashley Yacoubian; Deborah Wilkerson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Deep Layer Radiofrequency Thermo-coagulative Technology for Cervicofacial Contouring: Sonographic and Clinical Results.

Authors:  Sarit Cohen; Omri Dominsky; Ofir Artzi; Erez Dayan; Joseph Eckstein
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-12-18

5.  Patient satisfaction and efficacy of accent radiofrequency for facial skin wrinkle reduction.

Authors:  Fariba Jaffary; Mohammad Ali Nilforoushzadeh; Hajar Zarkoob
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Influence of the Dermis Thickness on the Results of the Skin Treatment with Monopolar and Bipolar Radiofrequency Currents.

Authors:  Ilja L Kruglikov
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.