OBJECTIVES: (1) to evaluate bone density in women with prolactinoma treated with dopamine agonists and healthy controls, using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), (2) to classify the results according to the current International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) criteria, and (3) to correlate bone density with lean and fat masses, biochemical data and clinical aspects of prolactinomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in two University referral centers. Forty-five premenopausal women with prolactinoma were submitted to DXA and blood analysis (prolactin, estradiol, testosterone, SHBG, calcium, phosphorus, PTH, C-telopeptides of type 1 collagen, and osteocalcin) by the time of their clinical evaluation. They were compared with 25 control women of similar age and body mass index distribution. RESULTS: Women with prolactinoma had lower lumbar spine Z-score than controls. Femoral neck, trochanter, and total proximal femur Z-scores were similar in patients and controls. Twenty-two percent of the patients had Z-scores below the expected age range vs. 4% in the control group. Lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total proximal femur Z-scores were mainly correlated with the amenorrhea duration. The trochanter Z-score was associated with the gynoid lean/fat mass ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current ISCD criteria, bone density evaluation in women with prolactinoma reveals bone loss, especially of trabecular type. Bone density in these patients was particularly associated with the duration of amenorrhea, which reinforces the importance of the adequate disease control in women with prolactinoma in order to avoid complications of this disease.
OBJECTIVES: (1) to evaluate bone density in women with prolactinoma treated with dopamine agonists and healthy controls, using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), (2) to classify the results according to the current International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) criteria, and (3) to correlate bone density with lean and fat masses, biochemical data and clinical aspects of prolactinomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in two University referral centers. Forty-five premenopausal women with prolactinoma were submitted to DXA and blood analysis (prolactin, estradiol, testosterone, SHBG, calcium, phosphorus, PTH, C-telopeptides of type 1 collagen, and osteocalcin) by the time of their clinical evaluation. They were compared with 25 control women of similar age and body mass index distribution. RESULTS:Women with prolactinoma had lower lumbar spine Z-score than controls. Femoral neck, trochanter, and total proximal femur Z-scores were similar in patients and controls. Twenty-two percent of the patients had Z-scores below the expected age range vs. 4% in the control group. Lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total proximal femur Z-scores were mainly correlated with the amenorrhea duration. The trochanter Z-score was associated with the gynoid lean/fat mass ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current ISCD criteria, bone density evaluation in women with prolactinoma reveals bone loss, especially of trabecular type. Bone density in these patients was particularly associated with the duration of amenorrhea, which reinforces the importance of the adequate disease control in women with prolactinoma in order to avoid complications of this disease.
Authors: C Di Somma; A Colao; A Di Sarno; M Klain; M L Landi; G Facciolli; R Pivonello; N Panza; M Salvatore; G Lombardi Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: A Colao; C Di Somma; S Loche; A Di Sarno; M Klain; R Pivonello; M Pietrosante; M Salvatore; G Lombardi Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: James N Roemmich; Pamela A Clark; Christos S Mantzoros; Cathy M Gurgol; Art Weltman; Alan D Rogol Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: M E L Arbouw; K L L Movig; T P van Staa; A C G Egberts; P C Souverein; F de Vries Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-10-22 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Helen S Pereira; Erika C Naliato; Aline B Moraes; Monica R Gadelha; Leonardo Vieira Neto; Renan M Almeida; Antonio E Nardi; Alice H Violante Journal: Braz J Psychiatry Date: 2020 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.697
Authors: Lukas Andereggen; Janine Frey; Robert H Andres; Markus M Luedi; Hans Rudolf Widmer; Jürgen Beck; Luigi Mariani; Emanuel Christ Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Renato Cozzi; Maria Rosaria Ambrosio; Roberto Attanasio; Claudia Battista; Alessandro Bozzao; Marco Caputo; Enrica Ciccarelli; Laura De Marinis; Ernesto De Menis; Marco Faustini Fustini; Franco Grimaldi; Andrea Lania; Giovanni Lasio; Francesco Logoluso; Marco Losa; Pietro Maffei; Davide Milani; Maurizio Poggi; Michele Zini; Laurence Katznelson; Anton Luger; Catalina Poiana Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 6.664