Literature DB >> 17660940

Deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic area is more effective than nucleus ventralis intermedius stimulation for bilateral intention tremor.

W Hamel1, J Herzog, F Kopper, M Pinsker, D Weinert, D Müller, P Krack, G Deuschl, H M Mehdorn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ventro-lateral thalamus is the stereotactic target of choice for severe intention tremor. Nevertheless, the optimal target area has remained controversial, and targeting of the subthalamic area has been suggested to be superior. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with disabling intention tremor of different etiology (essential tremor (n = 8), multiple sclerosis (n = 2) and one with, spinocerebellar ataxia) were implanted bilaterally with DBS electrodes targeted to the ventro-lateral thalamus using micro-recording and micro-stimulation. Among five tracks explored in parallel optimal tracks were chosen for permanent electrode implantation. Postoperative tremor suppression elicited by individual electrode contacts was quantified using a lateralised tremor rating scale at least 3 months (in most patients >1 year) after implantation. The position of electrode contacts was determined retrospectively from stereotactic X-ray exams and by correlation of pre- and postoperative MRI.
RESULTS: In all patients, DBS suppressed intention tremor markedly. On average, tremor on the left and right side of the body was improved by 68% (+/-19; standard deviation) and 73% (+/-21), respectively. In most patients, distal electrode contacts located in the subthalamic area proved to be more effective than proximal contacts in the ventro-lateral thalamus. In stereotactic coordinates, the optimal site was located 12.7 mm (+/-1.4; mean +/- standard deviation) lateral, 7.0 (+/-1.6) mm posterior, and 1.5 (+/-2.0) mm ventral to the mid-commissural point. In general, the best contacts could be selected for permanent stimulation. Nevertheless, in some instances, more proximal contacts had to be chosen because of adverse effects (paraesthesiae, dysarthria, gait ataxia) which were more pronounced with bilateral stimulation resulting in slightly less tremor suppression on the left and right side of body (63 +/- 18 and 68 +/- 19%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Direct comparison of different stimulation sites in individual patients revealed that DBS in the subthalamic area is more effective in suppressing pharmacoresistant intention tremor than the ventro-lateral thalamus proper. Anatomical structures possibly involved in tremor suppression include cerebello-thalamic projections, the prelemniscal radiation, and the zona incerta.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17660940     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-007-1230-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  32 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Todd M Herrington; Jennifer J Cheng; Emad N Eskandar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Comparing two deep brain stimulation leads to one in refractory tremor.

Authors:  R Mehanna; A G Machado; S Oravivattanakul; G Genc; S E Cooper
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Deep brain stimulation in uncommon tremor disorders: indications, targets, and programming.

Authors:  Carlo Alberto Artusi; Ashar Farooqi; Alberto Romagnolo; Luca Marsili; Roberta Balestrino; Leonard L Sokol; Lily L Wang; Maurizio Zibetti; Andrew P Duker; George T Mandybur; Leonardo Lopiano; Aristide Merola
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Invasive Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Cihat Uzunköprü
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.339

5.  Probabilistic conversion of neurosurgical DBS electrode coordinates into MNI space.

Authors:  Andreas Horn; Andrea A Kühn; Angela Merkl; Ludy Shih; Ron Alterman; Michael Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  [Deep brain stimulation for treatment of dystonia and tremor].

Authors:  L Timmermann; J Volkmann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.214

7.  Stimulus features underlying reduced tremor suppression with temporally patterned deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Merrill J Birdno; Alexis M Kuncel; Alan D Dorval; Dennis A Turner; Robert E Gross; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Deep Brain Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Volker A Coenen; Florian Amtage; Jens Volkmann; Thomas E Schläpfer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Deep brain stimulation in essential tremor: targets, technology, and a comprehensive review of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua K Wong; Christopher W Hess; Leonardo Almeida; Erik H Middlebrooks; Evangelos A Christou; Erin E Patrick; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.618

10.  Upper limbs dysmetria caused by cervical spinal cord injury: a case report.

Authors:  Hsun-Chang Lin; Chun-Hung Chen; Gim-Thean Khor; Poyin Huang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.