Literature DB >> 17660645

Various methods of caries removal in children: a comparative clinical study.

I K Pandit1, N Srivastava, N Gugnani, M Gupta, L Verma.   

Abstract

An in vivo study comparing the different methods of caries removal was done in children of age group 6-9 years. Among these patients a total number of 150 carious deciduous teeth were selected. Caries removal was done by hand instruments, airotor and carisolv. The efficacy, time taken and pain experienced by the patient during caries removal was evaluated. The results showed that airotor was the most efficient method (mean value 0.38), while carisolv was the least painful (mean value 0.080) and the most time consuming method (534.8 seconds).

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17660645     DOI： 10.4103/0970-4388.33456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent        ISSN： 0970-4388


  14 in total

1.  A comparative clinical study of various methods of caries removal in children.

Authors:  H K Soni; A Sharma; P B Sood
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-11-13

2.  Recent vs Conventional Methods of Caries Removal: A Comparative in vivo Study in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Swati Chowdhry; Sonali Saha; Firoza Samadi; J N Jaiswal; Aarti Garg; Preet Chowdhry
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2015-04-28

3.  Carisolv- an innovative method of caries removal.

Authors:  Vartika Kathuria; Anil V Ankola; Mamata Hebbal; Monica Mocherla
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

4.  Light induced fluorescence evaluation: A novel concept for caries diagnosis and excavation.

Authors:  Neeraj Gugnani; Ik Pandit; Nikhil Srivastava; Monika Gupta; Shalini Gugnani
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-10

5.  The Antibacterial Effects of Apacaries Gel on Streptococcus mutans: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Apa Juntavee; Jomjai Peerapattana; Ariya Ratanathongkam; Nartsajee Nualkaew; Supaporn Chatchiwiwattana; Panta Treesuwan
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2014-08-29

6.  Chemomechanical caries removal method versus mechanical caries removal methods in clinical and community-based setting: A comparative in vivo study.

Authors:  K V K Santosh Kumar; M Ghanashyam Prasad; R Venkata Sandeep; S Pavani Reddy; D Divya; K Pratyusha
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

7.  Caries Removal by Chemomechanical (Carisolv™) vs. Rotary Drill: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Viral P Maru; B S Shakuntala; C Nagarathna
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 8.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Caries Excavation Techniques in reducing the Cariogenic Flora: An in vivo Study.

Authors:  Afrah Fatima Hassan; Gunjan Yadav; Abhay Mani Tripathi; Mridul Mehrotra; Sonali Saha; Nishita Garg
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2016-09-27

9.  Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.

Authors:  Falk Schwendicke; Tanya Walsh; Thomas Lamont; Waraf Al-Yaseen; Lars Bjørndal; Janet E Clarkson; Margherita Fontana; Jesus Gomez Rossi; Gerd Göstemeyer; Colin Levey; Anne Müller; David Ricketts; Mark Robertson; Ruth M Santamaria; Nicola Pt Innes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-19

10.  Comparison of Marginal Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restorations in Primary Molars Prepared by Chemo-mechanical Caries Removal (CMCR), Erbium: Yttrium Aluminum-Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser and Atraumatic Restorative Technique (ART).

Authors:  Apa Juntavee; Niwut Juntavee; Jomjai Peerapattana; Nartsajee Nualkaew; Sitikorn Sutthisawat
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2013-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.