Literature DB >> 17660570

Natural variation for alleles under epigenetic control by the maize chromomethylase zmet2.

Irina Makarevitch1, Robert M Stupar, A Leonardo Iniguez, William J Haun, W Brad Barbazuk, Shawn M Kaeppler, Nathan M Springer.   

Abstract

The contribution of epigenetic alterations to natural variation for gene transcription levels remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the functional targets of the maize chromomethylase ZMET2 in multiple inbred lines to determine whether epigenetic changes conditioned by this chromomethylase are conserved or variable within the species. Gene expression microarrays were hybridized with RNA samples from the inbred lines B73 and Mo17 and from near-isogenic derivatives containing the loss-of-function allele zmet2-m1. A set of 126 genes that displayed statistically significant differential expression in zmet2 mutants relative to wild-type plants in at least one of the two genetic backgrounds was identified. Analysis of the transcript levels in both wild-type and mutant individuals revealed that only 10% of these genes were affected in zmet2 mutants in both B73 and Mo17 genetic backgrounds. Over 80% of the genes with expression patterns affected by zmet2 mutations display variation for gene expression between wild-type B73 and Mo17 plants. Further analysis was performed for 7 genes that were transcriptionally silent in wild-type B73, but expressed in B73 zmet2-m1, wild-type Mo17, and Mo17 zmet2-m1 lines. Mapping experiments confirmed that the expression differences in wild-type B73 relative to Mo17 inbreds for these genes were caused by cis-acting regulatory variation. Methylation-sensitive PCR and bisulfite sequencing demonstrated that for 5 of these genes the CpNpG methylation in the wild-type B73 genetic background was substantially decreased in the B73 zmet2-m1 mutant and in wild-type Mo17. A survey of eight maize inbreds reveals that each of these 5 genes exhibit transcriptionally silent and methylated states in some inbred lines and unmethylated, expressed states in other inbreds, providing evidence for natural variation in epigenetic states for some maize genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17660570      PMCID: PMC2034640          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.072702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  45 in total

1.  Expanding the genetic map of maize with the intermated B73 x Mo17 (IBM) population.

Authors:  Michael Lee; Natalya Sharopova; William D Beavis; David Grant; Maria Katt; Deborah Blair; Arnel Hallauer
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Intraspecific violation of genetic colinearity and its implications in maize.

Authors:  Huihua Fu; Hugo K Dooner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Molecular and functional diversity of maize.

Authors:  Edward S Buckler; Brandon S Gaut; Michael D McMullen
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 7.834

4.  Cis-transcriptional variation in maize inbred lines B73 and Mo17 leads to additive expression patterns in the F1 hybrid.

Authors:  Robert M Stupar; Nathan M Springer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genome-wide profiling of DNA methylation reveals transposon targets of CHROMOMETHYLASE3.

Authors:  Rachel Tompa; Claire M McCallum; Jeffrey Delrow; Jorja G Henikoff; Bas van Steensel; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Arabidopsis MET1 cytosine methyltransferase mutants.

Authors:  Mark W Kankel; Douglas E Ramsey; Trevor L Stokes; Susan K Flowers; Jeremy R Haag; Jeffrey A Jeddeloh; Nicole C Riddle; Michelle L Verbsky; Eric J Richards
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for maintenance of CpXpG methylation.

Authors:  A M Lindroth; X Cao; J P Jackson; D Zilberman; C M McCallum; S Henikoff; S E Jacobsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-05-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Maintenance of genomic methylation requires a SWI2/SNF2-like protein.

Authors:  J A Jeddeloh; T L Stokes; E J Richards
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  RNAi, DRD1, and histone methylation actively target developmentally important non-CG DNA methylation in arabidopsis.

Authors:  Simon W-L Chan; Ian R Henderson; Xiaoyu Zhang; Govind Shah; Jason S-C Chien; Steven E Jacobsen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Meiotically stable natural epialleles of Sadhu, a novel Arabidopsis retroposon.

Authors:  Sanjida H Rangwala; Rangasamy Elumalai; Cheryl Vanier; Hakan Ozkan; David W Galbraith; Eric J Richards
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  15 in total

1.  Trans chromosomal methylation in Arabidopsis hybrids.

Authors:  Ian K Greaves; Michael Groszmann; Hua Ying; Jennifer M Taylor; W James Peacock; Elizabeth S Dennis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stability of the MON 810 transgene in maize.

Authors:  Jose Luis La Paz; Maria Pla; Nina Papazova; Pere Puigdomènech; Carlos M Vicient
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Inactivation of a DNA methylation pathway in maize reproductive organs results in apomixis-like phenotypes.

Authors:  Marcelina Garcia-Aguilar; Caroline Michaud; Olivier Leblanc; Daniel Grimanelli
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Genetic perturbation of the maize methylome.

Authors:  Qing Li; Steven R Eichten; Peter J Hermanson; Virginia M Zaunbrecher; Jawon Song; Jennifer Wendt; Heidi Rosenbaum; Thelma F Madzima; Amy E Sloan; Ji Huang; Daniel L Burgess; Todd A Richmond; Karen M McGinnis; Robert B Meeley; Olga N Danilevskaya; Matthew W Vaughn; Shawn M Kaeppler; Jeffrey A Jeddeloh; Nathan M Springer
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Insights into the maize pan-genome and pan-transcriptome.

Authors:  Candice N Hirsch; Jillian M Foerster; James M Johnson; Rajandeep S Sekhon; German Muttoni; Brieanne Vaillancourt; Francisco Peñagaricano; Erika Lindquist; Mary Ann Pedraza; Kerrie Barry; Natalia de Leon; Shawn M Kaeppler; C Robin Buell
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Accessible DNA and relative depletion of H3K9me2 at maize loci undergoing RNA-directed DNA methylation.

Authors:  Jonathan I Gent; Thelma F Madzima; Rechien Bader; Matthew R Kent; Xiaoyu Zhang; Maike Stam; Karen M McGinnis; R Kelly Dawe
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Global epigenetic and transcriptional trends among two rice subspecies and their reciprocal hybrids.

Authors:  Guangming He; Xiaopeng Zhu; Axel A Elling; Liangbi Chen; Xiangfeng Wang; Lan Guo; Manzhong Liang; Hang He; Huiyong Zhang; Fangfang Chen; Yijun Qi; Runsheng Chen; Xing-Wang Deng
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Intraspecific hybrids of Arabidopsis thaliana revealed no gross alterations in endopolyploidy, DNA methylation, histone modifications and transcript levels.

Authors:  Ali Mohammad Banaei Moghaddam; Jörg Fuchs; Tobias Czauderna; Andreas Houben; Michael Florian Mette
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Spreading of heterochromatin is limited to specific families of maize retrotransposons.

Authors:  Steven R Eichten; Nathanael A Ellis; Irina Makarevitch; Cheng-Ting Yeh; Jonathan I Gent; Lin Guo; Karen M McGinnis; Xiaoyu Zhang; Patrick S Schnable; Matthew W Vaughn; R Kelly Dawe; Nathan M Springer
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Heritable epigenetic variation among maize inbreds.

Authors:  Steve R Eichten; Ruth A Swanson-Wagner; James C Schnable; Amanda J Waters; Peter J Hermanson; Sanzhen Liu; Cheng-Ting Yeh; Yi Jia; Karla Gendler; Michael Freeling; Patrick S Schnable; Matthew W Vaughn; Nathan M Springer
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.