Literature DB >> 17660488

A comparison of accuracy in bracket positioning between two techniques--localizing the centre of the clinical crown and measuring the distance from the incisal edge.

David Armstrong1, Gang Shen, Peter Petocz, M Ali Darendeliler.   

Abstract

The placement of orthodontic brackets is guided either by localizing the centre of the clinical crown (CC) or by measuring the distance from incisal edge (ME). The purpose of this study was to examine if there are any significant differences in the accuracy of bracket positioning between these two techniques. Typodont models were simulated with a Class I malocclusion with severe crowding. Nineteen experienced orthodontists (12 males, seven females) with a mean age of 40.6 years bonded pre-adjusted straight-wire brackets (Victory MBT) on the typodonts. Each orthodontist was asked to bond 20 brackets on one typodont using the CC method and 20 brackets on another typodont using the ME method. The teeth were removed from the typodont and photographed for imaging analysis. The errors of bracket placement in the vertical, mesiodistal, and angular/tip dimensions were measured and the data were statistically assessed. An overall test of significance, using all the data, rather than the means, demonstrated a significant vertical difference between the CC and ME methods, with the ME method more accurate vertically (mean CC = 1.19, mean ME = 1.10, P = 0.002) but no significant differences for mesiodistal (mean CC = -0.08, mean ME = -0.05, P = 0.28) or for tip (mean CC = -1.61, mean ME = -1.35, P = 0.34) errors. Analysis of the overall means and the arches independently showed that there was no significant difference in bracket accuracy between the two techniques (P > 0.05). Analysis of the teeth individually showed that the ME method was better in the vertical positioning for several upper and lower anterior teeth (P < 0.01) and poorer for the upper first premolars. The mean time taken to bond the 20 brackets showed no significant difference between two methods (CC 28.53 +/- 9.51 versus ME 28.21 +/- 10.43 minutes, P > 0.05). It is suggested that bracket bonding guided by measuring the distance from incisal edge may result in improved placement for anterior teeth. Archwire bending or bracket repositioning is still necessary to compensate for the inaccuracies with both techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17660488     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  12 in total

1.  Reproducibility of digital indirect bonding technique using three-dimensional (3D) models and 3D-printed transfer trays.

Authors:  Maria Eduarda Assad Duarte; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Alice Spitz; Flavia Artese; José Augusto Mendes Miguel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Effectiveness of an indirect bonding technique in reducing plaque accumulation around braces.

Authors:  Domenico Dalessandri; Michela Dalessandri; Stefano Bonetti; Luca Visconti; Corrado Paganelli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  The effect of vertical bracket positioning on torque and the resultant stress in the periodontal ligament--a finite element study.

Authors:  Ahmadreza Sardarian; Shahla Momeni Danaei; Shoaleh Shahidi; Sahar Ghodsi Boushehri; Allahyar Geramy
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 2.750

4.  Analysis of maxillary arch force/couple systems for a simulated high canine malocclusion: Part 1. Passive ligation.

Authors:  Jonathan Fok; Roger W Toogood; Hisham Badawi; Jason P Carey; Paul W Major
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Measurement and comparison of bracket transfer accuracy of five indirect bonding techniques.

Authors:  Ana E Castilla; Jennifer J Crowe; J Ryan Moses; Mansen Wang; Jack L Ferracane; David A Covell
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement with height bracket positioning gauge and boone gauge.

Authors:  Amir Mohammadi; Seyed Hossein Moslemzadeh
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2011-12-19

7.  Assessment of dimensional accuracy of preadjusted metal injection molding orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Shiva Alavi; Farnaz Tajmirriahi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016-09

8.  The effect of tooth morphology and vertical bracket positioning on resultant stress in periodontal ligament - a three dimensional finite element study.

Authors:  Rohit Kumar Maheshwari; Ashish Garg; Bhavna Virang; Upendra Singh Bhadauria
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2019-07-31

9.  A new device (FAQ.FIX®) for orthodontic bracket placement in straight wire technique.

Authors:  Francesco Mazzeo; Edoardo Marchese; Valeria Assumma; Joseph Sepe; Letizia Perillo
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Evaluation of the prototype of a new bracket-positioning gauge.

Authors:  Sergio Luiz Mota Júnior; Marcio José da Silva Campos; Carina Abrantes Schmitberger; Juliana de Andrade Vitral; Marcelo Reis Fraga; Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.