Literature DB >> 17660452

Circadian effects of light no brighter than moonlight.

Jennifer A Evans1, Jeffrey A Elliott, Michael R Gorman.   

Abstract

In mammals, light entrains endogenous circadian pacemakers by inducing daily phase shifts via a photoreceptor mechanism recently discovered in retinal ganglion cells. Light that is comparable in intensity to moonlight is generally ineffective at inducing phase shifts or suppressing melatonin secretion, which has prompted the view that circadian photic sensitivity has been titrated so that the central pacemaker is unaffected by natural nighttime illumination. However, the authors have shown in several different entrainment paradigms that completely dark nights are not functionally equivalent to dimly lit nights, even when nighttime illumination is below putative thresholds for the circadian visual system. The present studies extend these findings. Dim illumination is shown here to be neither a strong zeitgeber, consistent with published fluence response curves, nor a potentiator of other zeitgebers. Nevertheless, dim light markedly alters the behavior of the free-running circadian pacemaker. Syrian hamsters were released from entrained conditions into constant darkness or dim narrowband green illumination (~0.01 lx, 1.3 x 10(-9) W/cm(2), peak lambda = 560 nm). Relative to complete darkness, constant dim light lengthened the period by ~0.3 h and altered the waveform of circadian rhythmicity. Among animals transferred from long day lengths (14 L:10 D) into constant conditions, dim illumination increased the duration of the active phase (alpha) by ~3 h relative to complete darkness. Short day entrainment (8 L:16 D) produced initially long alpha that increased further under constant dim light but decreased under complete darkness. In contrast, dim light pulses 2 h or longer produced effects on circadian phase and melatonin secretion that were small in magnitude. Furthermore, the amplitude of phase resetting to bright light and nonphotic stimuli was similar against dimly lit and dark backgrounds, indicating that the former does not directly amplify circadian inputs. Dim illumination markedly alters circadian waveform through effects on alpha, suggesting that dim light influences the coupling between oscillators theorized to program the beginning and end of subjective night. Physiological mechanisms responsible for conveying dim light stimuli to the pacemaker and implications for chronotherapeutics warrant further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17660452     DOI: 10.1177/0748730407301988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  22 in total

1.  Separation of function for classical and ganglion cell photoreceptors with respect to circadian rhythm entrainment and induction of photosomnolence.

Authors:  L P Morin; K M Studholme
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Increased photic sensitivity for phase resetting but not melatonin suppression in Siberian hamsters under short photoperiods.

Authors:  G L Glickman; E M Harrison; J A Elliott; M R Gorman
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 3.  Sleep disparity, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic position.

Authors:  Michael A Grandner; Natasha J Williams; Kristen L Knutson; Dorothy Roberts; Girardin Jean-Louis
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.492

4.  Dynamic interactions between coupled oscillators within the hamster circadian pacemaker.

Authors:  Jennifer A Evans; Jeffrey A Elliott; Michael R Gorman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Short wavelength light administered just prior to waking: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michael A Grandner; Daniel F Kripke; Jeffrey Elliott; Roger Cole
Journal:  Biol Rhythm Res       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 1.219

6.  Dim nighttime illumination alters photoperiodic responses of hamsters through the intergeniculate leaflet and other photic pathways.

Authors:  J A Evans; S N Carter; D A Freeman; M R Gorman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 7.  In synch but not in step: Circadian clock circuits regulating plasticity in daily rhythms.

Authors:  J A Evans; M R Gorman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Twice daily melatonin peaks in Siberian but not Syrian hamsters under 24 h light:dark:light:dark cycles.

Authors:  Evan E Raiewski; Jeffrey A Elliott; Jennifer A Evans; Gena L Glickman; Michael R Gorman
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Artificial light at night advances avian reproductive physiology.

Authors:  Davide Dominoni; Michael Quetting; Jesko Partecke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Bright to dim oscillatory response of the Neurospora circadian oscillator.

Authors:  Van D Gooch; Alicia E Johnson; Luis F Larrondo; Jennifer J Loros; Jay C Dunlap
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.