Literature DB >> 17660272

Certification of creatinine in a human serum reference material by GC-MS and LC-MS.

Nathan G Dodder1, Susan S-C Tai, Lorna T Sniegoski, Nien F Zhang, Michael J Welch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To meet recommendations given by the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program for improving serum creatinine measurements, NIST developed standard reference material (SRM) 967 Creatinine in Frozen Human Serum. SRM 967 is intended for use by laboratories and in vitro diagnostic equipment manufacturers for the calibration and evaluation of routine clinical methods.
METHODS: The SRM was produced from 2 serum pools with different creatinine concentrations. The concentrations were certified using a higher-order isotope-dilution GC-MS method and an isotope-dilution LC-MS method. The LC-MS method is a potential higher-order reference measurement procedure.
RESULTS: The GC-MS mean (CV) concentrations were 67.0 (0.9%) mumol/L for serum pool 1 and 346.1 (0.45%) mumol/L for serum pool 2. The LC-MS results were 66.1 (0.2%) mumol/L and 346.3 (0.2%) mumol/L, respectively. For serum pool 1, there was a 1.4% difference between the mean GC-MS and LC-MS measurements, and a 0.10% difference for serum pool 2. The results from the 2 methods were combined to give the certified concentrations and expanded uncertainties.
CONCLUSIONS: The certified concentration (expanded uncertainty) of SRM 967 was 66.5 (1.8) mumol/L for serum pool 1 (a value close to the diagnostically important concentration of 88.4 mumol/L) and 346.2 (7.4) mumol/L for serum pool 2 (a concentration corresponding to that expected in a patient with chronic kidney disease).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17660272     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.090027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  15 in total

Review 1.  Calibration and precision of serum creatinine and plasma cystatin C measurement: impact on the estimation of glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Pierre Delanaye; Etienne Cavalier; Jean-Paul Cristol; Joris R Delanghe
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  Prevalence of proteinuria and elevated serum cystatin C among HIV-Infected Adolescents in the Reaching for Excellence in Adolescent Care and Health (REACH) study.

Authors:  Kristal J Aaron; Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Robert H Christenson; Craig M Wilson; Paul Muntner; Sadeep Shrestha
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method.

Authors:  Meixian Ou; Yunxiao Song; Shuijun Li; Gangyi Liu; Jingying Jia; Menqi Zhang; Haichen Zhang; Chen Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Albuminuria is an independent risk factor of T4 elevation in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Xin Du; Binbin Pan; Wenwen Li; Yonghua Zou; Xi Hua; Wenjuan Huang; Xin Wan; Changchun Cao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and renal function are associated with apolipoprotein E concentration in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Monika Czaplińska; Agnieszka Ćwiklińska; Monika Sakowicz-Burkiewicz; Ewa Wieczorek; Agnieszka Kuchta; Robert Kowalski; Barbara Kortas-Stempak; Alicja Dębska-Ślizień; Maciej Jankowski; Ewa Król
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  From urban dust and marine sediment to Ginkgo biloba and human serum-a top ten list of Standard Reference Materials (SRMs).

Authors:  Stephen A Wise
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Clinical evaluation of analytical variations in serum creatinine measurements: why laboratories should abandon Jaffe techniques.

Authors:  Iefke Drion; Christa Cobbaert; Klaas H Groenier; Cas Weykamp; Henk J G Bilo; Jack F M Wetzels; Nanne Kleefstra
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  9. GFR - Where are We Now?

Authors:  Joris R Delanghe
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2009-04-20

9.  Did Creatinine Standardization Give Benefits to the Evaluation of Glomerular Filtration Rate?

Authors:  Laurence Piéroni; Anne-Sophie Bargnoux; Jean-Paul Cristol; Etienne Cavalier; Pierre Delanaye
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2017-12-19

10.  The fat mass, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and chronic inflammation in type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Tomáš Šálek; Alena Adamíková; Petr Ponížil
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.