Literature DB >> 17660029

Complex compartmental behavior of small water-soluble uremic retention solutes: evaluation by direct measurements in plasma and erythrocytes.

Sunny Eloot1, An Torremans, Rita De Smet, Bart Marescau, Peter Paul De Deyn, Pascal Verdonck, Raymond Vanholder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although scanty data suggest that large solutes show kinetic behavior different from urea, there are virtually no data comparing the kinetics of urea with those of other small water-soluble uremic compounds, which are believed to behave similarly. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of kinetics of urea and guanidino compounds in plasma and erythrocyte compartments during a single hemodialysis session. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Six stable hemodialysis patients on standard low-flux dialysis therapy. PREDICTORS: Reduction ratios (RRs) of urea calculated from plasma and erythrocyte concentrations. OUTCOMES: RRs for guanidino compounds calculated from measurements of both plasma and erythrocyte concentrations. MEASUREMENTS: Blood samples were collected from the dialyzer inlet and outlet at 0, 5, 15, 30, and 120 minutes and at the end of the session. Plasma and erythrocyte concentrations of urea and guanidino compounds (creatinine [CTN], guanidinosuccinic acid [GSA], guanidinoacetic acid [GAA], guanidine [G], and methylguanidine [MG]) were determined.
RESULTS: Postdialysis plasma RR was higher for GSA (82% +/- 3%) compared with urea (77% +/- 2%; P < 0.01), whereas CTN (69% +/- 4%), GAA (49% +/- 14%), G (55% +/- 7%), and MG (55% +/- 7%) showed smaller RRs (P < 0.01). In erythrocytes, GSA (45% +/- 1%), G (10% +/- 13%), and MG (27% +/- 10%) showed markedly smaller RRs than urea (59% +/- 6%; P < 0.05). Finally, significant differences were found between plasma and erythrocyte RRs for urea, GSA, G, and MG (P < 0.01). LIMITATIONS: Discrepancies were found between the biochemical and mathematical approaches. Hence, the erythrocyte compartment does not necessarily conform to the kinetic nonperfused compartment.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate by means of direct estimations that the compartmental behaviors of guanidino compounds and urea are substantially different. Hence, we should consider that not all changes in concentrations in uremia and dialysis are representatively reflected by urea kinetics, even when considering other small water-soluble substances, such as the guanidino compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17660029     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  24 in total

1.  Prominent accumulation in hemodialysis patients of solutes normally cleared by tubular secretion.

Authors:  Tammy L Sirich; Benjamin A Funk; Natalie S Plummer; Thomas H Hostetter; Timothy W Meyer
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Once upon a time in dialysis: the last days of Kt/V?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Griet Glorieux; Sunny Eloot
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 3.  Home haemodialysis and uraemic toxin removal: does a happy marriage exist?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Sunny Eloot; Nathalie Neirynck; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  Searching for uremic toxins.

Authors:  Mirela Dobre; Timothy W Meyer; Thomas H Hostetter
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Simulation-based sodium thiosulfate dosing strategies for the treatment of calciphylaxis.

Authors:  Rajendra Pratap Singh; Hartmut Derendorf; Edward A Ross
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Dialysis cannot be dosed.

Authors:  Timothy W Meyer; Tammy L Sirich; Thomas H Hostetter
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 7.  Measurement and Estimation of Residual Kidney Function in Patients on Dialysis.

Authors:  Tariq Shafi; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.620

Review 8.  An update on uremic toxins.

Authors:  N Neirynck; R Vanholder; E Schepers; S Eloot; A Pletinck; G Glorieux
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Methylamine clearance by haemodialysis is low.

Authors:  Manish P Ponda; Zhe Quan; Michal L Melamed; Amanda Raff; Timothy W Meyer; Thomas H Hostetter
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Considerations in the statistical analysis of hemodialysis patient survival.

Authors:  Christos Argyropoulos; Chung-Chou H Chang; Laura Plantinga; Nancy Fink; Neil Powe; Mark Unruh
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.