Jane M Osowski1, Tianna Beare, Bonny Specker. 1. EA Martin Program in Human Nutrition, Box 2204, EAM Bldg, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to measure calcium and bone-related nutrient intakes in a rural South Dakota population. DESIGN: Intake estimates from FFQ were compared with four 24-hour recalls obtained quarterly during the preceding year. SUBJECTS: Convenience sample of 100 participants of the South Dakota Rural Bone Health Study were recruited, with 81 completing the FFQ. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Calcium and bone-related nutrient intakes were expressed as milligrams per day, milligrams per 1,000 kcal, or quartiles. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Intakes by FFQ and 24-hour recalls were compared using paired t test and quartiles were formed to examine cross-classification. RESULTS: Calcium intakes from FFQ and recalls were 1,287 and 1,141 mg/day (P=0.01), but calcium per 1,000 kcal did not differ. Calcium intake by FFQ correlated with intake by recall when expressed as milligrams per day (r=0.49, P<0.001) or milligrams per 1,000 kcal (r=0.59, P<0.001). Bland-Altman graphs indicated fairly good agreement between methods. Seventy-eight percent of subjects fell into the same or within one quartile category when calcium intake was expressed as milligrams per day and 83% when expressed as milligrams per 1,000 kcal. Gross misclassification occurred in 0% to 4% of the nutrients. CONCLUSIONS: Although FFQ may not be a valid indicator of an individual's intake, it does adequately classify rural populations into quartiles of calcium and bone-related nutrient intakes, making it a useful tool for assessing dietary calcium and bone related intake in rural populations.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to measure calcium and bone-related nutrient intakes in a rural South Dakota population. DESIGN: Intake estimates from FFQ were compared with four 24-hour recalls obtained quarterly during the preceding year. SUBJECTS: Convenience sample of 100 participants of the South Dakota Rural Bone Health Study were recruited, with 81 completing the FFQ. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Calcium and bone-related nutrient intakes were expressed as milligrams per day, milligrams per 1,000 kcal, or quartiles. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Intakes by FFQ and 24-hour recalls were compared using paired t test and quartiles were formed to examine cross-classification. RESULTS:Calcium intakes from FFQ and recalls were 1,287 and 1,141 mg/day (P=0.01), but calcium per 1,000 kcal did not differ. Calcium intake by FFQ correlated with intake by recall when expressed as milligrams per day (r=0.49, P<0.001) or milligrams per 1,000 kcal (r=0.59, P<0.001). Bland-Altman graphs indicated fairly good agreement between methods. Seventy-eight percent of subjects fell into the same or within one quartile category when calcium intake was expressed as milligrams per day and 83% when expressed as milligrams per 1,000 kcal. Gross misclassification occurred in 0% to 4% of the nutrients. CONCLUSIONS: Although FFQ may not be a valid indicator of an individual's intake, it does adequately classify rural populations into quartiles of calcium and bone-related nutrient intakes, making it a useful tool for assessing dietary calcium and bone related intake in rural populations.
Authors: G A P Pereira; P S Genaro; L C Santos; K S Sarkis; M M Pinheiro; V L Szjenfeld; N J Schuch; L A Martini Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Bonny L Specker; Howard E Wey; Teresa L Binkley; Tianna M Beare; Maggie Minett; Lee Weidauer Journal: Bone Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Ana Zaragoza-Martí; Rosario Ferrer-Cascales; José Antonio Hurtado-Sánchez; Ana Laguna-Pérez; María José Cabañero-Martínez Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 5.717