Literature DB >> 17658260

Power amplification in the mammalian cochlea.

Andrei N Lukashkin1, Mark N Walling, Ian J Russell.   

Abstract

It was first suggested by Gold in 1948 [1] that the exquisite sensitivity and frequency selectivity of the mammalian cochlea is due to an active process referred to as the cochlear amplifier. It is thought that this process works by pumping energy to augment the otherwise damped sound-induced vibrations of the basilar membrane [2-4], a mechanism known as negative damping. The existence of the cochlear amplifier has been inferred from comparing responses of sensitive and compromised cochleae [5] and observations of acoustic emissions [6, 7] and through mathematical modeling [8, 9]. However, power amplification has yet to be demonstrated directly. Here, we prove that energy is indeed produced in the cochlea on a cycle-by-cycle basis. By using laser interferometry [10], we show that the nonlinear component of basilar-membrane responses to sound stimulation leads the forces acting on the membrane. This is possible only in active systems with negative damping [11]. Our finding provides the first direct evidence for power amplification in the mammalian cochlea. The finding also makes redundant current hypotheses of cochlear frequency sharpening and sensitization that are not based on negative damping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17658260     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  13 in total

1.  Outer hair cell somatic electromotility in vivo and power transfer to the organ of Corti.

Authors:  Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Prestin links extrinsic tuning to neural excitation in the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Thomas D Weddell; Marcia Mellado-Lagarde; Victoria A Lukashkina; Andrei N Lukashkin; Jian Zuo; Ian J Russell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Frequency-dependent properties of the tectorial membrane facilitate energy transmission and amplification in the cochlea.

Authors:  G P Jones; V A Lukashkina; I J Russell; S J Elliott; A N Lukashkin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Measurement of cochlear power gain in the sensitive gerbil ear.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He; Peter G Gillespie
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Change in cochlear response in an animal model of otitis media with effusion.

Authors:  Chenkai Dai; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Effect of the cochlear microphonic on the limiting frequency of the mammalian ear.

Authors:  Kuni H Iwasa; Bora Sul
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Modified protein expression in the tectorial membrane of the cochlea reveals roles for the striated sheet matrix.

Authors:  Gareth P Jones; Stephen J Elliott; Ian J Russell; Andrei N Lukashkin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Axonemal Dynein DNAH5 is Required for Sound Sensation in Drosophila Larvae.

Authors:  Bingxue Li; Songling Li; Zhiqiang Yan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 5.203

9.  The group delay and suppression pattern of the cochlear microphonic potential recorded at the round window.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Edward Porsov; David Kemp; Alfred L Nuttall; Tianying Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Analysis of the mouse mutant Cloth-ears shows a role for the voltage-gated sodium channel Scn8a in peripheral neural hearing loss.

Authors:  F E Mackenzie; A Parker; N J Parkinson; P L Oliver; D Brooker; P Underhill; V A Lukashkina; A N Lukashkin; C Holmes; S D M Brown
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.