Literature DB >> 17658199

Foot and mouth disease virus transmission among vaccinated pigs after exposure to virus shedding pigs.

K Orsel1, M C M de Jong, A Bouma, J A Stegeman, A Dekker.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to design a transmission experiment that enabled quantification of the effectiveness of vaccination against foot and mouth disease (FMD) virus in groups of pigs. Previous experiments showed that intradermal injection of pigs with FMD virus 14 days after vaccination was not suitable to start an infection chain, as inoculated vaccinated pigs resisted challenge. Therefore, we carried out two experiments in which we used direct contact to a non-vaccinated pig as route of infection. In the first experiment only the vaccine effect on susceptibility was quantified by exposing pigs, either vaccinated 14 days before or not vaccinated, each to a non-vaccinated seeder pig inoculated with FMD virus O/NET/2001. Since no significant differences were observed between contact infections in vaccinated or non-vaccinated pigs, we performed a second experiment in which both susceptibility and infectivity were subject to vaccination. We quantified virus transmission in homogenous groups of vaccinated or non-vaccinated pigs in which the infection chain was started by exposure to a third group of non-vaccinated infected pigs. Transmission occurred to all contact-exposed pigs in the non-vaccinated groups and to 9 out of 10 contact-exposed pigs in the vaccinated groups. The rate of transmission (beta) was significantly reduced in the vaccine group. Yet, the estimated reproduction ratio in both groups was still above 1. In conclusion, by adjusting our transmission study design and challenge method, we were able to quantify transmission of FMDV among vaccinated pigs. According to this study a single vaccination was not sufficient to stop pig to pig virus transmission. With these results major outbreaks may still be expected, even in groups of vaccinated pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17658199     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  18 in total

1.  Modeling the spread and control of foot-and-mouth disease in Pennsylvania following its discovery and options for control.

Authors:  Michael J Tildesley; Gary Smith; Matt J Keeling
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  The effect of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccination on virus transmission and the significance for the field.

Authors:  Karin Orsel; Annemarie Bouma
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  A new blocking ELISA for detection of foot-and-mouth disease non-structural protein (NSP) antibodies in a broad host range.

Authors:  Madhusudan Hosamani; Shreya Gopinath; B P Sreenivasa; Subhasmita Behera; Suresh H Basagoudanavar; Ashok Boora; Durlav P Bora; Pankaj Deka; Veerakyathappa Bhanuprakash; Raj Kumar Singh; Aniket Sanyal; Klaas Weerdmeester; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 5.560

Review 4.  Parameterization of the duration of infection stages of serotype O foot-and-mouth disease virus: an analytical review and meta-analysis with application to simulation models.

Authors:  Fernando Mardones; Andrés Perez; Javier Sanchez; Mohammad Alkhamis; Tim Carpenter
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.683

5.  Vaccination of influenza a virus decreases transmission rates in pigs.

Authors:  Anna Romagosa; Matt Allerson; Marie Gramer; Han Soo Joo; John Deen; Susan Detmer; Montserrat Torremorell
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Quantification of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus caused by an environment contaminated with secretions and excretions from infected calves.

Authors:  Carla Bravo de Rueda; Mart C M de Jong; Phaedra L Eblé; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.683

7.  Virus Excretion from Foot-And-Mouth Disease Virus Carrier Cattle and Their Potential Role in Causing New Outbreaks.

Authors:  Aravindh Babu R Parthiban; Mana Mahapatra; Simon Gubbins; Satya Parida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease: do initial conditions affect its benefit?

Authors:  Thibaud Porphyre; Harriet K Auty; Michael J Tildesley; George J Gunn; Mark E J Woolhouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Pathogenesis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Pigs.

Authors:  Carolina Stenfeldt; Fayna Diaz-San Segundo; Teresa de Los Santos; Luis L Rodriguez; Jonathan Arzt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-05-23

Review 10.  Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review.

Authors:  Sarah J Cox; Paul V Barnett
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.