Literature DB >> 17656233

Impact of urethral stump length on continence and positive surgical margins in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

James F Borin1, Douglas W Skarecky, Navneet Narula, Thomas E Ahlering.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We previously reported the benefit of meticulous apical dissection in reducing positive surgical margins (SM+) at the apex. Herein we assess whether a more aggressive urethral transection will reduce positive margins and whether reduced urethral length affects return to continence. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: All data were collected prospectively. A positive surgical margin was defined by the presence of cancer cells with ink on them. Continence, defined as no pads, was assessed with validated Expanded Prostate Cancer Instrument Composite questionnaires. Evaluation of 200 consecutive cases (group 1) revealed that 75% of surgical margins occurred at the apex. Concomitantly we assessed visual cues for urethral length, which demonstrated that even patients with very short urethral stumps requiring perineal pressure during anastomosis had equivalent times to continence as those with long, accessible stumps. We altered the point of transection, distally, to include 3 to 6 mm more of striated external urethral sphincter. The SM+ rate and time to continence for the ensuing 200 cases (group 2) were tracked. The overall SM+ and apical SM+ rates were significantly reduced (SM+ 17.6% versus 7.5%, P = 0.003; and apical SM+ 13% versus 5.5%, P = 0.01). Kaplan-Meier times to continence curves were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: A more aggressive apical resection resulted in marked reduction in overall SM+ rates without measurable change in time to continence or overall continence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17656233     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  15 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence.

Authors:  Harveer S Dev; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Abhishek Srivastava; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: update 2008].

Authors:  H John
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Single-centre study comparing standard apical dissection with a modified technique to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Xiao-Yong Pu; Jie Si-Tu; Wen-Tao Huang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Manoj B Patel; Marcelo A Orvieto; Sanket Chauhan; Vincenzo Ficarra; Sara Melegari; Kenneth J Palmer; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  The diffusion of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States: a case study of the introduction of new surgical devices.

Authors:  C B Anderson; E B Elkin; C L Atoria; J A Eastham; P T Scardino; K Touijer
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma after malignant infantile osteopetrosis in childhood: a case report.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Hongyi He; Jing Zhao; Yangyang Ma; Kai Li; Lian Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2018-07-01

7.  Overall rate, location, and predictive factors for positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sung Gu Kang; Oscar Schatloff; Abdul Muhsin Haidar; Srinivas Samavedi; Kenneth J Palmer; Jun Cheon; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has lower biochemical recurrence than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seon Heui Lee; Hyun Ju Seo; Na Rae Lee; Soo Kyung Son; Dae Keun Kim; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-04-28

9.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after the first decade: surgical evolution or new paradigm.

Authors:  Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2013-04-03

10.  The surgical procedure is the most important factor affecting continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Seungsoo Lee; Chang Jin Yoon; Hyun Jun Park; Jeong Zoo Lee; Hong Koo Ha
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 5.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.