OBJECTIVE: Most rating scales for bipolar disorders (BDs) do not encompass the spectrum of symptomatology now established as characterizing the illness. We report the rationale, format, reliability and initial validity studies of the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale (BISS), a 44-item scale designed to encompass the spectrum of behavioral disturbances in BDs. METHOD: Structured video interviews of 20 patients representing four bipolar syndromal subtypes were rated by nine raters. RESULTS: Generally, high inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were established for the depression and mania subscales and the BISS total score. The BISS discriminated across subtypes of bipolar patients with depressed, manic/hypomanic, mixed manic or recovered status. CONCLUSION: The BISS has adequate reliability, concurrent validity and is capable of discriminating between bipolar subtypes. It also provides a comprehensive scale to assess discrete behavioral components of BD.
OBJECTIVE: Most rating scales for bipolar disorders (BDs) do not encompass the spectrum of symptomatology now established as characterizing the illness. We report the rationale, format, reliability and initial validity studies of the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale (BISS), a 44-item scale designed to encompass the spectrum of behavioral disturbances in BDs. METHOD: Structured video interviews of 20 patients representing four bipolar syndromal subtypes were rated by nine raters. RESULTS: Generally, high inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were established for the depression and mania subscales and the BISS total score. The BISS discriminated across subtypes of bipolar patients with depressed, manic/hypomanic, mixed manic or recovered status. CONCLUSION: The BISS has adequate reliability, concurrent validity and is capable of discriminating between bipolar subtypes. It also provides a comprehensive scale to assess discrete behavioral components of BD.
Authors: William V Bobo; Noreen A Reilly-Harrington; Terence A Ketter; Benjamin D Brody; Gustavo Kinrys; David E Kemp; Richard C Shelton; Susan L McElroy; Louisa G Sylvia; James H Kocsis; Melvin G McInnis; Edward S Friedman; Vivek Singh; Mauricio Tohen; Charles L Bowden; Thilo Deckersbach; Joseph R Calabrese; Michael E Thase; Andrew A Nierenberg; Dustin J Rabideau; David A Schoenfeld; Stephen V Faraone; Masoud Kamali Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Joseph M Cerimele; Simon B Goldberg; Christopher J Miller; Stephen W Gabrielson; John C Fortney Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Peter M Thompson; Dianne A Cruz; Elizabeth A Fucich; Dianna Y Olukotun; Masami Takahashi; Makoto Itakura Journal: Mol Neuropsychiatry Date: 2015-12-01
Authors: Gabriel R Fries; Gabriela D Colpo; Nancy Monroy-Jaramillo; Junfei Zhao; Zhongming Zhao; Jodi G Arnold; Charles L Bowden; Consuelo Walss-Bass Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Theodore D Satterthwaite; Joseph W Kable; Lillie Vandekar; Natalie Katchmar; Danielle S Bassett; Claudia F Baldassano; Kosha Ruparel; Mark A Elliott; Yvette I Sheline; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Christos Davatzikos; Ellen Leibenluft; Michael E Thase; Daniel H Wolf Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Marco Bortolato; Consuelo Walss-Bass; Peter M Thompson; Jackob Moskovitz Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Jodi M Gonzalez; Charles L Bowden; Martin M Katz; Peter Thompson; Vivek Singh; Thomas J Prihoda; Martha Dahl Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.035