Literature DB >> 17654296

Mainstream smoke emissions of Australian and Canadian cigarettes.

Bill King1, Ron Borland, Jeff Fowles.   

Abstract

We investigated how mainstream smoke emissions vary and interrelate in 15 Australian and 21 Canadian brands, using public emissions disclosures from 2001. These disclosures provided emission data for 40 hazardous agents under both standard and intensive ISO testing conditions. Our analyses focused on "adjusted emissions" (i.e., emissions per milligram of nicotine yield) for 13 selected agents. Adjusted emissions differed significantly by ISO testing condition for 9 of the 13 selected agents. Intensive condition adjusted emissions were strongly negatively correlated for several agent pairs. Country and manufacturer variables were the strongest predictors of intensive condition adjusted emissions for 8 of the 13 selected agents and significant predictors for all of them. Taken together, these results suggest potential for the intent of emission limits to be undermined by risk swapping (in which one specific exposure is reduced within a group at the cost of another's exposure increasing) and risk shifting (in which a specific exposure is reduced within a group at the cost of that exposure's increasing within another group).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17654296     DOI: 10.1080/14622200701485109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  5 in total

1.  Effect of differing levels of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in cigarette smoke on the levels of biomarkers in smokers.

Authors:  David L Ashley; Richard J O'Connor; John T Bernert; Clifford H Watson; Gregory M Polzin; Ram B Jain; David Hammond; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Gary A Giovino; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; Lion Shahab; Bill King; Geoffrey T Fong; Liqin Zhang; Yang Xia; Xizheng Yan; Joan M McCraw
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Scientific assessment of the use of sugars as cigarette tobacco ingredients: a review of published and other publicly available studies.

Authors:  Ewald Roemer; Matthias K Schorp; Jean-Jacques Piadé; Jeffrey I Seeman; Donald E Leyden; Hans-Juergen Haussmann
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Tobacco companies' efforts to undermine ingredient disclosure: the Massachusetts benchmark study.

Authors:  Clayton Velicer; Stella Aguinaga-Bialous; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  Hazardous compounds in tobacco smoke.

Authors:  Reinskje Talhout; Thomas Schulz; Ewa Florek; Jan van Benthem; Piet Wester; Antoon Opperhuizen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Differences in cadmium transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke, compared to arsenic or lead.

Authors:  J-J Piadé; G Jaccard; C Dolka; M Belushkin; S Wajrock
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2014-11-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.