Literature DB >> 17654226

Determining the spatial variability of personal sampler inlet locations.

Robert Vinson1, Jon Volkwein, Linda McWilliams.   

Abstract

This article examines the spatial variability of dust concentrations within a coal miner's breathing zone and the impact of sampling location at the cap lamp, nose, and lapel. Tests were conducted in the National Institute for Safety and Health Pittsburgh Research Laboratory full-scale, continuous miner gallery using three prototype personal dust monitors (PDM). The dust masses detected by the PDMs were used to calculate the percentage difference of dust mass between the cap lamp and the nose and between the lapel and the nose. The calculated percentage differences of the masses ranged from plus 12% to minus 25%. Breathing zone tests were also conducted in four underground coal mines using the torso of a mannequin to simulate a miner. Coal mine dust was sampled with multi-cyclone sampling cans mounted directly in front of the mannequin near the cap lamp, nose, and lapel. These four coal mine tests found that the spatial variability of dust levels and imprecision of the current personal sampler is a greater influence than the sampler location within the breathing zone. However, a one-sample t-test of this data did find that the overall mean value of the cap lamp/nose ratio was not significantly different than 1 (p-value = 0.21). However, when applied to the overall mean value of the lapel/nose ratio there was a significant difference from 1 (p-value < .0001). This finding is important because the lapel has always been the sampling location for coal mine dust samples. But these results suggest that the cap location is slightly more indicative of what is breathed through the nose area.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17654226     DOI: 10.1080/15459620701540618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  2 in total

1.  Testing a revised inlet for the personal dust monitor.

Authors:  Steven E Mischler; Donald P Tuchman; Emanuele G Cauda; Jay F Colinet; Elaine N Rubinstein
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  A field study on the possible attachment of DPM and respirable dust in mining environments.

Authors:  Sallie Gaillard; Emily Sarver; Emanuele Cauda
Journal:  J Sustain Min       Date:  2019-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.