Comparative functional analysis of aquaporins/glyceroporins in mammals and anurans.

Maintenance of fluid homeostasis is critical to establishing and maintaining normal physiology. The landmark discovery of membrane water channels (aquaporins; AQPs) ushered in a new area in osmoregulatory biology that has drawn from and contributed to diverse branches of biology, from molecular biology and genomics to systems biology and evolution, and from microbial and plant biology to animal and translational physiology. As a result, the study of AQPs provides a unique and integrated backdrop for exploring the relationships between genes and genome systems, the regulation of gene expression, and the physiologic consequences of genetic variation. The wide species distribution of AQP family members and the evolutionary conservation of the family indicate that the control of membrane water flux is a critical biological process. AQP function and regulation is proving to be central to many of the pathways involved in individual physiologic systems in both mammals and anurans. In mammals, AQPs are essential to normal secretory and absorptive functions of the eye, lung, salivary gland, sweat glands, gastrointestinal tract, and kidney. In urinary, respiratory, and gastrointestinal systems, AQPs are required for proper urine concentration, fluid reabsorption, and glandular secretions. In anurans, AQPs are important in mediating physiologic responses to changes in the external environment, including those that occur during metamorphosis and adaptation from an aquatic to terrestrial environment and thermal acclimation in anticipation of freezing. Therefore, an understanding of AQP function and regulation is an important aspect of an integrated approach to basic biological research.

Mechanisms of fluid homeostasis and aquaporins

The maintenance of fluid homeostasis is critical to all life processes. Vertebrates have evolved intricate physiologic mechanisms for sensing and responding to changes in fluid composition and volume that are caused by environmental variables such as diet, health, hydration, injury, disease, temperature, and other stressors. The biological mechanisms that regulate fluid homeostasis in amphibians and mammals are complex and highly coordinated processes involving the precise regulation of ensembles of ion and water transporters. While osmotically driven transmembrane water movement can occur via simple diffusion through the lipid bilayer, selective membrane water permeability required for rapid and regulated physiologic processes such as secretion and reabsorption requires facilitation through proteinaceous water pores. Aquaporins (AQPs) are water-selective channels that function to increase plasma membrane water permeability in response to osmotic gradients. AQP1 (CHIP28), the first mammalian water channel to be functionally characterized, was isolated from the membranes of red blood cells as a 28-kDa protein and was shown to increase membrane permeability in response to osmotic gradients (Preston and Agre 1991; Preston et al. 1992). Amino acid homology with the major intrinsic protein (MIP) of the lens indicated that AQP1 is a member of the MIP family of membrane proteins (Gorin et al. 1984). In 2003, Dr. Peter Agre was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry to signify the importance of this discovery (Agre 2004). To date, more than 450 members of the MIP superfamily of integral membrane proteins have since been identified in a wide range of organisms, including mammals (reviewed in Krane and Kishore 2003), plants (reviewed in Chaumont et al. 2005), yeast (reviewed in Pettersson et al. 2005), bacteria (reviewed in Tanghe et al. 2006), and anurans (reviewed in Suzuki et al. 2007).

Aquaporin structure

MIP superfamily members are typically 28–30 kDa in size and construct an integral membrane pore, characterized topographically by six transmembrane spanning domains, with cytosolic amino and carboxy termini (Fig. 1). Structural and amino acid similarities between the first and second half of the protein and comparative analysis of gene structure in paralogous sequences indicate that AQPs likely arose by way of an intragenic duplication that occurred relatively early in evolution (Pao et al. 1991). Intracellular loop B and extracellular loop E contain highly conserved asparagine-proline-alanine (NPA) motifs which are inserted into the membrane to create the functional water pore, generating what is referred to as the “hourglass model” (Jung et al. 1994). In some family members, a cysteine residue in the extracellular loop E (Cys 189 in human AQP1) that is situated close to the pore confers functional channel inhibition by mercurials through physical blockage of the pore (Preston et al. 1993; Zhang et al. 1993). Recent studies have indicated that the water permeability of a subset of aquaporins can be blocked by quaternary ammonium compounds such as tetraethyl ammonium (TEA) (Detmers et al. 2006). AQPs assemble as homotetramers in the membrane; however, each monomer is a functional water pore that supports bidirectional, osmotically driven transmembrane water flow. In vivo, the direction of water flow through AQPs is determined by the osmotic gradient that exists across the membrane during specific physiologic processes such as absorption or secretion driven by active ion transport.

Fig. 1

Transmembrane structure of MIP family of integral membrane proteins. Hydropathy plots of primary amino acid sequence of the major intrinsic membrane protein family identified a six-transmembrane-spanning topology. X-ray crystallography and electron microscopy confirmed this structure and provided further proof of homotetramer membrane assembly. The conserved NPA motifs are indicated in loops B and E. The cysteine shown in loop E confers mercury sensitivity in many MIP proteins. Amino acid positions P1-P5 confer functional permeability for either water or glycerol in the AQP and GLP subfamilies, respectively

The NPA motifs are present in nearly all MIP family members, with a few exceptions. Among the 13 known mammalian MIP family members, AQP7, AQP11, and AQP12 encode variant versions of the NPA box in loop B, and AQP7 also has a variant second NPA box in loop E. The proline in the NPA box of loop B of AQP7 is changed to an alanine, thereby changing the first NPA motif to NAA, whereas a serine replaces the alanine in loop E, resulting in an NPS motif (reviewed in Zardoya 2005). The first NPA box in the B loops of AQP 11 and AQP12 is changed to NPC and NPT, respectively (Gorelick et al. 2006; Itoh et al. 2005).

Aquaporins vs. aquaglyceroporins

Aquaporins

Other primary amino acid sequence differences that exist between members of the MIP family have given rise to two structural classes of proteins whose functions are distinctive. Aquaporins (AQPs) are water-selective members of the MIP family, whereas aquaglyceroporins (GLPs) transport both water and organic compounds such as glycerol, urea (reviewed in Hara-Chikuma and Verkman 2006), and potentially other small solutes (e.g., NH3 and NH4+; Holm et al. 2005). The determination of pore selectivity for water in the AQP subclass has been examined through a variety of experimental methods, including site-directed mutagenesis, chimeric domain swaps, membrane permeability assays, electron crystallography, X-ray crystallography, and molecular dynamic simulations (reviewed in Gonen and Walz 2006). X-ray crystallographic analysis of bovine AQP1 from red blood cells at a 2.2-Å resolution identified extracellular and cytosolic pore entry/exit passageways for water molecules that are separated by a central constriction region of the channel (Sui et al. 2001). The constriction region is formed by the interactions of four amino acids within the pore (His 182, Arg 197, Cys 191, Phe 58), which limits the pore size to a 2.8-Å diameter (Sui et al. 2001). Three of the amino acids found within the constriction site are conserved in all water-specific MIP members (Arg 197, His 182, Phe 58; Park and Saier 1996) and contribute to the water selectivity seen in the AQP subclass of the MIP family. In addition, a “selectivity filter,” consisting of six amino acids, was identified. It forces water to make and break hydrogen bonds as molecules pass single file through the pore (Sui et al. 2001). Using real-time molecular dynamic simulations of water movement through human AQP1, De Groot and Grubmüller (2001) proposed a two-stage filter model in which the NPA motif forms a selectivity-determining region, and a second region termed the aromatic/arginine (ar/R) region functions as a proton filter.

Aquaglyceroporins

Transport of glycerol has been studied in a few cell types, vertebrate and otherwise. In some cells glycerol crosses the membrane readily, whereas others are quite impermeable (Vom Dahl and Häussinger 1997). In liver, permeation of glycerol across the membrane (as opposed to its phosphorylation and metabolism) is the rate-limiting step in glycerol utilization (Li and Lin 1983). Characteristics described for this transport include a combination of simple diffusion and H+- or Na+-coupled cotransport (Carlsen and Wieth 1976; Lages and Lucas 1995; Lucas et al. 1990). The mechanism is distinct from the glucose transporter and may be phloretin-sensitive (vom Dahl and Häussinger 1997). These studies may well have incorporated characteristics of multiple transport mechanisms, which remain poorly defined. One mechanism that is common to cells ranging from E. coli (Heller et al. 1980) to insect (Farinas et al. 1995) to mammalian kidney involves glycerol transport via proteins from the aquaporin family. The “selectivity” of the AQP subclass was determined based on comparisons made with members of the GLP subclass. The best studied member of the GLP subclass is GlpF, a glycerol facilitator isolated from E. coli that is permeable to glycerol, urea, and glycine, with very low water permeability (Borgnia and Agre 2001; Maurel et al. 1994). Although GlpF assembles a transmembrane structure that is roughly similar to AQP1, the channel is asymmetric, and the lengths of the extracellular loops and constituents at several amino acid positions within the constriction region and selectivity filter differ significantly from AQP1 (Lu et al. 2003; Sui et al. 2001; reviewed in Gonen and Walz 2006). Five amino acid positions (P1-P5) located in transmembrane helix 3 (P1), extracellular loop E (P2, P3), and transmembrane helix 6 (P4, P5) differ consistently between the AQP and GLP subfamilies in both mammalian and nonmammalian species (Table 1; Fig. 1) (Froger et al. 1998; Heymann and Engel 2000; Lagree et al. 1999). X-ray crystallographic images in the absence of glycerol confirmed the results of the functional studies showing that GlpF does facilitate water transport (Sui et al. 2001; Tajkhorshid et al. 2002), although GlpF-mediated water permeability is far less than glycerol permeability. Since then the structure of several members of both the AQP and GLP subfamilies in a variety of organisms has been resolved at the atomic level (reviewed in Gonen and Walz 2006).

Table 1

Amino acid conservation at sites determinative of AQP vs. GLP selectivity

Position	Location	AQP	GLP	HC-1	HC-2	HC-3
P1	Transmembrane Helix 3	Nonaromatic	Aromatic	Thr	Thr	Tyr
P2	Extracellular Loop E	Small and uncharged	Asp	Ser	Ser	Asp
P3	Extracellular Loop E	Small and uncharged	Lys or Arg	Ala	Ala	Arg
P4	Transmembrane Helix 6	Aromatic	Pro	Phe	Phe	Pro
P5	Transmembrane Helix 6	Aromatic	Nonaromatic	Trp	Trp	Iso

Amino acids at positions P1-P5 determine AQP vs. GLP function and are conserved in mammalian and nonmammalian species (Froger et al. 1998; Heymann and Engel 2000; Lagree et al. 1999). Amino acids at positions P1-P5 for AQP members HC-1, HC-2, and HC-3, the latter a glyceroporin, from the anuran H. chrysoscelis (HC) are included as examples of conservation in a nonmammalian species (Zimmerman et al. 2007).

Functional and phylogenetic classes of mammalian aquaporins/aquaglyceroporins

Thirteen functionally and phylogenetically distinct mammalian water channels (AQP0–AQP12) have been identified on the basis of sequence homology to AQP1. Evolutionary comparison of mammalian MIP sequences classify AQP0, AQP1, AQP2, AQP4, AQP5, AQP6, and AQP8 as members of the water-selective aquaporin subgroup, whereas AQP3, AQP7, AQP9, and AQP10 are evolutionarily grouped as aquaglyceroporins (Gonen and Walz 2006; Gorelick et al. 2006; Zardoya 2005) (Fig. 2, Table 2). AQP11 and AQP12 are the most distantly related paralogs (Morishita et al. 2005). They have only approximately 20% homology with the MIP family and may constitute a third functionally distinct evolutionary branch of the MIP superfamily (Gorelick et al. 2006; Itoh et al. 2005; Morishita et al. 2004, 2005).

Fig. 2

Phylogram of human AQP/GLPs. A phylogram was generated using human AQP/GLP protein sequences available through NCBI/Swiss-PROT and the multisequence alignment program ClustalW available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/index.html. The phylogenetic relationships shown here are consistent with previously published trees (Gorelick et al. 2006; Itoh et al. 2005)

Table 2

Phylogenetic/functional classifications and tissue distribution of mammalian MIPs

Gene name	Phylogenetic AQP/GLP	Functional permeability	Tissue/cellular localization
AQP0	AQP	Water	Lens of the eye
AQP1	AQP	Water	Kidney (proximal tubule and thin descending limb of the loop of Henle), erythrocytes, capillary endothelium, choroid plexus, corneal epithelium, ear, lung, GI tract, skeletal muscle, heart muscle
AQP2	AQP	Water	Kidney (principal cells of the collecting duct and connecting tubules; apical surface and subapical vesicles)
AQP3	GLP	Urea and glycerol; water	Kidney (principal cells of the collecting duct and connecting tubules; basolateral surface), airways, lung, GI tract, brain, ear, urinary bladder, cornea, epidermis
AQP4	AQP	Water	Kidney (collecting duct principal cells; basolateral), retina, ear, airways, lung, GI tract, fast-twitch skeletal muscle, glial cells at blood brain barrier, astrocytes
AQP5	AQP	Water	Salivary gland, lacrimal gland, trachea, epithelia of nasopharynx and airways, alveolar type 1 cells, ear, eye, placenta, pancreas
AQP6	AQP	Anions (NO3− and Cl−; water	Kidney (intracellular vesicles in type A intercalated cells of the collecting duct)
AQP7	GLP	Urea and glycerol; water, arsenite	Testis, sperm, kidney (proximal tubule), adipose tissue, skeletal muscle
AQP8	AQP	Urea and NH3, water	Testis, sperm, GI tract, placenta, kidney (proximal tubule and collecting duct), airways, liver, salivary glands, glial and neuronal cells, pancreas
AQP9	GLP	Urea and glycerol; water, arsenite	Liver, testis, sperm, spleen, brain, leukocytes, kidney, lung, brain (astrocytes and ependymal cells)
AQP10	GLP	Urea and glycerol; water	Duodenum, jejunum
AQP11	*SuperAQP	Unknown	Kidney (intracellular localization in proximal tubule), liver, testis, brain
AQP12	*SuperAQP	Unknown	Pancreas (acinar cells)

Typically, MIP family members are functionally characterized for osmotic water permeability by expressing the candidate AQP/GLP cRNA in Xenopus oocytes and assessing cell volume changes upon hypotonic challenge (Preston et al. 1992). Likewise, solute (i.e., urea/glycerol) permeability can be determined by measuring solute uptake in isotonic solution. In some instances, AQP/GLP function has also been assessed in reconstituted proteoliposomes (Zeidel et al. 1992) or by expression in yeast (Lagree et al. 1998). Functionally, AQPs 0–10 support various levels of transmembrane water permeability (Table 2). AQP0, AQP6, AQP9, and AQP10 show low water permeability compared with AQP1, AQP2, AQP3, AQP4, AQP5, AQP7, and AQP8. The water permeability of AQP3 and AQP6 is affected by pH. AQP3, AQP7, AQP9, and AQP10 are also permeable to both urea and glycerol, whereas AQP8 has been reported to exhibit urea and ammonia permeability (Saparov et al. 2007). Interestingly, both AQP7 and AQP9 have been reported to facilitate arsenite uptake (Liu et al. 2002), and AQP6 functions as an anion channel, with permeability to nitrate and chloride (Ikeda et al. 2002; Yasui et al. 1999). The membrane transport properties of AQP11 and AQP12 are currently unknown. Evaluation of AQP11 function in Xenopus oocytes failed to identify any water, urea, glycerol, or ion permeability under various pH conditions (Gorelick et al. 2006). The transport properties of AQP12 remain unstudied because of the inability to obtain adequate plasma membrane expression in Xenopus oocytes (Itoh et al. 2005).

Mammalian AQP/GLP expression

The subsets of organ, tissue, cellular, and subcellular expression patterns of the 13 known mammalian MIP family members are unique for each protein (Table 2). For example, whereas AQP1 is constitutively expressed in diverse tissues, AQP2, AQP10, and AQP12 show a narrow range of tissue-specific expression: AQP2 is predominantly present in principal cells of the renal collecting duct, with minor functionally significant expression in epididymis (Nelson et al. 1998) and inner ear (Merves et al. 2000), AQP10 in the small intestine, and AQP12 in the pancreas (Table 2). Moreover, most if not all MIP genes are subject to temporal and tissue-selective expression via mechanisms that control transcription and translation, and in some cases through post-translational modifications, vesicular trafficking, and polar membrane insertion. AQP2 is perhaps the best-studied MIP with regard to mechanisms that regulate its expression. In the renal collecting duct, AQP2 vesicular trafficking is regulated by arginine vasopressin (AVP), the mammalian antidiuretic hormone (ADH), in response to dehydration (Kishore et al. 1996; Nielsen et al. 1995). In addition, AQP2 mRNA and protein expression are upregulated in response to chronic dehydration (DiGiovanni et al. 1994; Terris et al. 1996). Other signaling cues responsible for altering MIP gene expression include cAMP (Yang et al. 2003), cGMP (Ishikawa et al. 1998, 2002) NO (Ishikawa et al. 2002; Nagai et al. 2007), hypertonicity (Hoffert et al. 2000), cholinergic stimulation (Ishida et al. 1997), TNF-α (Towne et al. 2001), and steroids (King et al. 1996). It is clear that MIP family gene expression is highly regulated at multiple levels in response to a variety of physiologic triggers. The list of regulators will no doubt continue to expand as more is learned about the importance of MIP function during development and in normal physiologic and pathophysiologic states.

Physiologic function of AQP/GLPs in mammals

Some of what is known of the physiologic function of AQPs has been learned by examining the clinical manifestation and associated pathology of AQP deficiency in human disease. Human disorders whose pathogeneses are associated with defects in water channel proteins include inherited cataracts (AQP0; Berry et al. 2000; Francis et al. 2000) and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (AQP2; Deen et al. 1994; reviewed in Knoers and Deen 2001), and water channel dysfunctions have been implicated in the etiology of Sjogren’s syndrome (AQP5; Beroukas et al. 2001; Steinfeld et al. 2001; Tsubota et al. 2001). Individuals lacking functional AQP1 have a decrease in pulmonary vascular permeability (King et al. 2002) and fail to concentrate urine maximally when dehydrated (King et al. 2001). The list of AQP involvement in human disease is likely to increase as an understanding of the complexity of AQP function becomes better realized.

Targeted disruptions of individual water channel proteins in knockout mouse models have been useful in further elucidating the role of AQP/GLPs in whole-animal physiology. Table 3 summarizes the phenotypes reported to date for the AQP-deficient mice currently available. The information gleaned from the knockout strains implicates abnormal AQP function/regulation as a potential contributor to other urine-concentrating defects (AQP3; Ma et al. 2000b) and to human diseases such as disorders of the skin (AQP3; Ma et al. 2002), impaired wound healing (AQP3; Hara et al. 2002), hearing loss (AQP4; Li and Verkman 2001), salivary gland secretory defects (Ma et al. 1999; Krane et al. 2001b), impaired sweat gland function (Nejsum et al. 2002), asthma (AQP5; Krane et al. 2001a), diabetes and insulin resistance (AQP7; Hibuse et al. 2005), obesity (AQP7; Hara-Chikuma et al. 2005) and polycystic kidney disease (AQP11; Morishita et al. 2005). As such associations emerge for human pathologies, designed pharmacologic inhibition of AQP function may be of specific clinical utility, such as for preventing cellular migration during metastatic tumor progression (AQP1; Saadoun et al. 2005) or in response to brain edema or ischemic injury (AQP4; Manley et al. 2000).

Table 3

Phenotypes of MIP-deficient mouse strains

Gene Name	Phenotype of MIP-deficient mouse strains	Reference
AQP0	Cataracts	Shiels and Bassnett 1996
AQP1	Polyuria, defective proximal tubule fluid absorption	Ma et al. 1998
	Decreased osmotic water permeability across endothelium	Bai et al. 1999
AQP2	Severe polyuria; failure to thrive	Rojek et al. 2006
AQP3	Urinary concentrating defect—NDI	Ma et al. 2000b
	Reduced skin hydration and elasticity	Ma et al. 2002
	Delayed wound healing	Hara et al. 2002
AQP4	Mild urine-concentrating defect	Ma et al. 1997
	Reduced injury-induced brain edema	Manley et al. 2000
	Hearing defects	Li and Verkman 2001
AQP5	Impaired salivary secretion	Krane et al. 2001b; Ma et al. 1999
	Airway hyperresponsiveness to cholinergic stimulation	Krane et al. 2001a
	Impaired stimulated sweat secretion	Nejsum et al. 2002
	Decreased osmotic water permeability across alveolar epithelium	Ma et al. 2000a
	Impaired secretion in airway submucosal glands	Song and Verkman 2001
AQP6	Unknown
AQP7	Increased body fat with adipocyte hypertrophy	Hara-Chikuma et al. 2005
	Increased body weight and age-dependent insulin resistance	Hibuse et al. 2005
AQP8	Mild hypertriglyceridemia	Yang et al. 2005
AQP9	Unknown
AQP10	Unknown
AQP11	Polycystic kidney disease (proximal tubule)	Morishita et al. 2005
AQP12	Unknown

AQPs/GLPs in thermal tolerance: the importance of comparative analyses of nonmammalian subjects

Aquaporin proteins are found ubiquitously among the kingdoms of living things. Many of these organisms experience extremes of thermal and osmotic stress far beyond those tolerated by mammals. One such circumstance is the possibility of substantial cellular dehydration elicited by freezing; organisms ranging from bacteria through certain vertebrates tolerate subfreezing temperatures, and they do so using a combination of water and solute transport mechanisms.

Recently, the importance of AQP/GLP in the process of glycerol-facilitated cryopreservation has been shown under natural and experimental conditions. Glycerol is an organic solute commonly used in biomedicine as a cryoprotectant to enable bacterial, fungal, and embryonic cells to freeze at ultralow temperatures without compromised viability. Enhanced AQP/GLP expression correlates with improved freeze tolerance in baker’s yeast (Tanghe et al. 2002) and sperm (Dibas et al. 1998), and artificial AQP/GLP expression improves viability following cryopreservation of fish embryos (Hagedorn et al. 2002) and mouse oocytes (Edashige et al. 2003), suggesting that facilitated glycerol transport through AQP/GLP may participate in the physiology of freeze tolerance in animals. Clinical cryopreservation is currently most successful with small or single-celled tissues. Therefore, insights into how a multicellular organism survives freezing could yield important clues to the cryopreservation of larger tissues and organs. For example, modeling studies have suggested that cryopreservation of whole mammalian kidneys, which would entail perfusion of cryopreservative solution such as glycerol through the vasculature, would succeed best if tissue permeability to the cryopreservative agent were high, thereby minimizing osmotically induced changes in cellular and extracellular volumes (Lachenbruch et al. 1998). Thus, the comparative analysis of AQPs/GLPs in amphibians, a subset of which undergo a physiologic process of cryopreservation and freeze tolerance (sometimes involving glycerol accumulation), may serve as a model for testing such ideas.

Role of the kidneys in conserving organic solutes in anurans

Renal conservation of cryoprotective solutes may be critical to freeze-tolerant anurans. Repeated cycles of freezing and thawing deplete glycogen stores in anuran liver (Lee and Costanzo 1993), quite likely because glucose is lost in the urine: The renal tubules have a limited capacity for glucose reabsorption, and this may be overwhelmed at high glucose concentrations occurring after freezing (Layne et al. 1996). Wood frogs may compensate for this loss by cutaneous uptake of excreted glucose.

In wood frogs, glycogenesis is initiated promptly upon thawing, thereby minimizing the duration of high plasma glucose and so its potential urinary loss. In contrast, gray treefrogs retain high plasma glycerol concentrations for weeks, before and after freezing. How do they avoid urinary loss of this solute? Presumably glycerol is filtered, albeit at a reduced rate, in cold-acclimated frogs, which have reduced rates of glomerular filtration (Zimmerman et al. 2007). Thus, reabsorption of filtered glycerol should be at a premium.

In other circumstances when glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is reduced in amphibians, plasma arginine vasotocin (AVT), the amphibian antidiuretic hormone, is elevated (Nouwen and Kuhn 1983; Rosenbloom and Fisher 1974). AVT may act on the renal vasculature to reduce GFR (Pang 1983), on the bladder to increase water permeability, and on the renal tubules (Uchiyama 1994). The physiologic response of the latter structures to AVT is not known, but one response of vertebrate kidneys to ADH is upregulation and membrane insertion of aquaporins, which could mediate reabsorption of water and/or glycerol.

Aquaporins in amphibians

Historically, amphibians have played a critical role in the conceptualization of and suggestion for the existence of water channels long before the first water channel was cloned. Indeed, even before aquaporins were understood as such, careful study of toad urinary bladder suggested the “shuttle hypothesis,” based on visualization of “particle aggregates” that appeared to be inserted into and retrieved from the apical membrane under conditions of changing water reabsorption (e.g., Wade 1989; Wade et al. 1981). Additional evidence has confirmed a role for AQPs and GLPs in amphibian osmoregulation. Aquaporins have been identified in amphibian skin, bladder, fat body, and elsewhere (Ma et al. 1996; Virkki et al. 2002; Zimmerman et al. 2007), and several proteins of the aquaporin family have been sequenced from anurans. Phylogenetic analysis of 17 anuran AQP mRNA sequences deposited in public databases has revealed six classes of anuran AQPs, two of which are distinct to anurans (reviewed in Suzuki et al. 2007). “FA-CHIP” in Rana esculenta (Abrami et al. 1994), “AQP-t1” in Bufo marinus (Ma et al. 1996), AQP-h1 in Hyla japonica (Hasegawa et al. 2003), and HC-1 in Hyla chrysoscelis (Zimmerman et al. 2007) resemble each other in both sequence and wide tissue distribution patterns. These proteins are also similar to mammalian AQP1 (76%–98% sequence identity), and expression cloning has confirmed that AQP-t1, AQP-h1, and HC-1 function as water but not as glycerol channels (Hasegawa et al. 2003; Ma et al. 1996; Zimmerman et al. 2007) (Table 1). Temperature-sensitive regulation of HC-1 expression was seen in brain, kidney, and liver; frogs acclimated to cold conditions (4°C) had higher HC-1 mRNA expression in the liver than did warm-acclimated frogs, whereas in brain and kidney warm-acclimated frogs expressed higher levels of HC-1 (Zimmerman et al. 2007) (Fig. 3). A second AQP, HC-2, has recently been isolated from urinary bladder cDNA from H. chrysoscelis and shows strong amino conservation compared with mammalian AQP2 (69% identity, 85% similarity; Zimmerman et al. 2007). Like hAQP2, HC-2 was functionally determined to be within the AQP subclass, and it supported osmotically driven water transport (Zimmerman et al. 2007) (Table 1). HC-2 mRNA was detected primarily in organs of osmoregulation (skin, bladder, and kidney; Zimmerman et al. 2007). Interestingly, like HC-1, HC-2 expression varied depending on thermal conditions, i.e., hydrated frogs that were acclimated to cold conditions (4°C) had high levels of HC-2 expression in skin, whereas no HC-2 expression was observed from the ventral skin of hydrated warm-acclimated frogs (Zimmerman et al. 2007).

Fig. 3

Relative HC-1 and HC-3 mRNA expression in warm- vs. cold-acclimated tissues from H. chrysoscelis. Relative mRNA expression (real-time PCR, expression of HC-1 or HC-3 mRNA normalized to expression of β-actin mRNA) in an aquaporin (HC-1) and a glyceroporin (HC-3) from the anuran Hyla chrysoscelis. Note that expression varies both among tissues and depending on acclimation to either warm (20°C) or cold (4°C) conditions

To date, four anuran sequences similar to mammalian AQP3 have been identified. They include AQP3 from X. laevis (Schreiber et al 2000), AQP from X. tropicalis (unpublished; GenBank Accession number CR855446), AQP-h3BL from H. japonica (Akabane et al. 2007), and HC-3 from H. chrysoscelis (Zimmerman et al. 2007). HC-3 from H. chrysoscelis shows 82% identity and 94% amino acid similarity with mammalian AQP3, and functionally it performs as a GLP, with low water permeability and high glycerol permeability (Zimmerman et al. 2007) (Table 1). HC-3 mRNA exhibited both tissue-specific and thermal-selective patterns of expression. Of special note, tissue glycerol concentrations increased in the liver and skeletal muscle in cold-acclimated frogs compared with warm-acclimated frogs (Fig. 3). The increase in glycerol concentration in these tissues corresponds well with an increase in HC-3 mRNA abundance in muscle, liver, and bladder in cold-acclimated frogs (Zimmerman et al. 2007). Studies of mammalian GLPs are just beginning to elucidate potential physiologic roles for their facilitation of glycerol transport. These roles include glycerol export from adipocytes (Hara-Chikuma et al. 2005) and a contribution to pliability in skin (Ma et al. 2002). Amphibians that naturally accumulate glycerol represent a natural model for studying the roles and regulation of glycerol-transporting aquaporins.

Two aquaporins from H. japonica (AQP-h2 and AQP-h3) have been sequenced (Hasegawa et al. 2003; Tanii et al. 2002) that have high homology to each other and to AQP-t2 and AQP-t3 from B. marinus. Suzuki et al. (2007) have suggested that these four genes form an anuran-specific, phylogenetically distinct MIP subclass (type AQPa2). AQP-h2 and AQP-h3 are both expressed in ventral skin, whereas AQP-h2 is also expressed in the urinary bladder. Expression of both is upregulated by AVT (Hasegawa et al. 2005). Coexpression of the AVT receptor, AQP-h2, and AQP-h3 during metamorphosis, when the animals are undergoing a transition from aquatic to terrestrial environment, suggests a role for AVT-regulated AQPs in this process (Hasegawa et al. 2004). A second anuran-specific phylogenetic class, type-a1, has been assigned for a novel aquaporin identified from oocytes of X. laevis; that protein exhibits unique mercury sensitivity and less than 50% amino acid identity to the most closely related mammalian aquaporins (Virkki et al. 2002).

Conclusion

Studies of mammalian aquaporins have revealed many details of structure and function and are beginning to yield insights into pathogenic mechanisms. Nevertheless, mammalian aquaporins comprise a relatively limited subset of proteins from this large class of molecules. Proteins from the MIP family are present in every sort of organism, from bacteria through fungi, plants, and animals. It is likely that novel insights into structure-function relationships, into mechanisms of regulation, and into physiologic roles will derive from this diversity of organisms. Amphibians present particularly attractive models for studies of aquaporin function in vertebrate osmoregulation and thermoregulation; transitions from water to land and tolerance of tissue freezing are the epitomes of combined osmotic and thermal demands. Thus, just as studies of amphibians contributed to the original elucidation of aquaporin function, before we knew of aquaporins per se, we suggest that such studies will continue to contribute to a fundamental understanding of these ubiquitous proteins.