Literature DB >> 17651963

Characteristics of healthcare wastes.

L F Diaz1, L L Eggerth, Sh Enkhtsetseg, G M Savage.   

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of the quantities and characteristics of the material that needs to be managed is one of the most basic steps in the development of a plan for solid waste management. In this case, the material under consideration is the solid waste generated in healthcare facilities, also known as healthcare waste. Unfortunately, limited reliable information is available in the open literature on the quantities and characteristics of the various types of wastes that are generated in healthcare facilities. Thus, sound management of these wastes, particularly in developing countries, often is problematic. This article provides information on the quantities and properties of healthcare wastes in various types of facilities located in developing countries, as well as in some industrialized countries. Most of the information has been obtained from the open literature, although some information has been collected by the authors and from reports available to the authors. Only data collected within approximately the last 15 years and using prescribed methodologies are presented. The range of hospital waste generation (both infectious and mixed solid waste fractions) varies from 0.016 to 3.23kg/bed-day. The relatively wide variation is due to the fact that some of the facilities surveyed in Ulaanbaatar include out-patient services and district health clinics; these facilities essentially provide very basic services and thus the quantities of waste generated are relatively small. On the other hand, the reported amount of infectious (clinical, yellow bag) waste varied from 0.01 to 0.65kg/bed-day. The characteristics of the components of healthcare wastes, such as the bulk density and the calorific value, have substantial variability. This literature review and the associated attempt at a comparative analysis point to the need for worldwide consensus on the terms and characteristics that describe wastes from healthcare facilities. Such a consensus would greatly facilitate comparative analyses among different facilities, studies and countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17651963     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  8 in total

1.  On-site or off-site treatment of medical waste: a challenge.

Authors:  Hassan Taghipour; Taher Mohammadyarei; Mohamad Asghari Jafarabadi; Ahmad Asl Hashemi
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2014-04-16

2.  Retrospection-Simulation-Revision: Approach to the Analysis of the Composition and Characteristics of Medical Waste at a Disaster Relief Site.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Lihua Wu; Feng Tian; Zheng Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues.

Authors:  Navarro Ferronato; Vincenzo Torretta
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Plasma gasification of the medical waste.

Authors:  Altug Alp Erdogan; Mustafa Zeki Yilmazoglu
Journal:  Int J Hydrogen Energy       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 5.816

5.  Healthcare Waste Management Practices and Associated Factors in Private Clinics in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Berhanu Wassie; Binyam Gintamo; Zelalem Negash Mekuria; Zemichael Gizaw
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2022-01-17

Review 6.  A review of the medical waste management system at Covid-19 situation in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Uttama Barua; Dipita Hossain
Journal:  J Mater Cycles Waste Manag       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Biomedical waste disposal practices among healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic in secondary and tertiary care facilities of Tamil Nadu.

Authors:  Yuvaraj Krishnamoorthy; Anuradha R; Sathish Rajaa; Gerald Samuel; Isha Sinha
Journal:  Indian J Med Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 1.347

Review 8.  Mini-Review: Assessing the Potential Impact of Microneedle Technologies on Home Healthcare Applications.

Authors:  Aaron McConville; Catherine Hegarty; James Davis
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.