Literature DB >> 17651009

Foveal word reading requires interhemispheric communication.

Zoë R Hunter1, Marc Brysbaert, Stefan Knecht.   

Abstract

The left cerebral hemisphere is dominant for language processing in most individuals. It has been suggested that this asymmetric language representation can influence behavioral performance in foveal word-naming tasks. We carried out two experiments in which we obtained laterality indices by means of functional imaging during a mental word-generation task, using functional transcranial Doppler sonography and functional magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. Subsequently, we administered a behavioral word-naming task, where participants had to name foveally presented words of different lengths shown in different fixation locations shifted horizontally across the screen. The optimal viewing position for left language dominant individuals is located between the beginning and the center of a word. It is shifted toward the end of a word for right language dominant individuals and, to a lesser extent, for individuals with bilateral language representation. These results demonstrate that interhemispheric communication is required for foveal word recognition. Consequently, asymmetric representations of language and processes of interhemispheric transfer should be taken into account in theoretical models of visual word recognition to ensure neurological plausibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17651009     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Position of phonetic components may influence how written words are processed in the brain: Evidence from Chinese phonetic compound pronunciation.

Authors:  Janet H Hsiao; Tianyin Liu
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J White; Simon P Liversedge; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Kevin B Paterson; Stoyan Kurtev
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Word learning and the cerebral hemispheres: from serial to parallel processing of written words.

Authors:  Andrew W Ellis; Roberto Ferreira; Polly Cathles-Hagan; Kathryn Holt; Lisa Jarvis; Laura Barca
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Explaining left lateralization for words in the ventral occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier; Cathy J Price
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  An fMRI study of visual hemifield integration and cerebral lateralization.

Authors:  Lars Strother; Zhiheng Zhou; Alexandra K Coros; Tutis Vilis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: the evidence from Arabic.

Authors:  Abubaker A A Almabruk; Kevin B Paterson; Victoria McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Giorgio Fuggetta; Kevin B Paterson; Stoyan Kurtev; Mengyun Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Functional foveal splitting: evidence from neuropsychological and multimodal MRI investigations in a Chinese patient with a splenium lesion.

Authors:  Benyan Luo; Chunlei Shan; Renjing Zhu; Xuchu Weng; Sheng He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cooperation or competition of the two hemispheres in processing characters presented at vertical midline.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Marie Dittmer; Kamila Smigasiewicz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.