Literature DB >> 17650518

Continuous cardiac output during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: pulse-contour analyses vs pulmonary artery thermodilution.

P S Halvorsen1, A Sokolov, M Cvancarova, P K Hol, R Lundblad, T I Tønnessen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No gold standard method exists for monitoring continuous cardiac output (CO). In this study, the agreement between the two most frequently used methods, PiCCO pulse-contour analysis (PCCO) and STAT pulmonary artery thermodilution (STAT-CO), was assessed during multiple-vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery.
METHODS: Thirty patients were enrolled in the study. Two time periods were defined during surgery; Period 1 included positioning of the heart and stabilizer device and Period 2 included the coronary occlusion. Measurements were obtained every minute during both periods. The agreement for the continuous CO and the change in CO (DeltaCO) was estimated using the Bland-Altman method.
RESULTS: Significant changes in mean arterial pressure (DeltaMAP), central venous saturation, PCCO and STAT-CO were seen only during Period 1. DeltaMAP correlated only with changes in PCCO, (P < 0.001, r = 0.60). The mean difference (2sd) between PCCO and STAT-CO ranged from - 0.29 (1.82) to - 0.71 (2.57) litre min(-1), and the percentage error varied from 32 to 50%. For the CO measurements, the limits of agreements did not differ between Period 1 and Period 2. In contrast, for the DeltaCO measurements, the limits of agreements were wider in Period 1 than in the more haemodynamically stable Period 2.
CONCLUSIONS: CCO and STAT-CO show large discrepancies in CO during OPCAB surgery. Clinically acceptable agreement was seen only for trends in CO during haemodynamically stable periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17650518     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of cardiac output measures by transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis, and pulmonary artery thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a subgroup analysis of the cardiovascular anaesthesia registry at a single tertiary centre.

Authors:  Youn Joung Cho; Chang-Hoon Koo; Tae Kyong Kim; Deok Man Hong; Yunseok Jeon
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Design, analysis, and interpretation of method-comparison studies.

Authors:  Sandra K Hanneman
Journal:  AACN Adv Crit Care       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun

Review 3.  Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  Bart F Geerts; Leon P Aarts; Jos R Jansen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring.

Authors:  Yatin Mehta; Dheeraj Arora
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-26

Review 5.  Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement: an update.

Authors:  Lisa Sangkum; Geoffrey L Liu; Ling Yu; Hong Yan; Alan D Kaye; Henry Liu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Cardiac output assessed by invasive and minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Allison J Lee; Jennifer Hochman Cohn; J Sudharma Ranasinghe
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-07-06

7.  Accuracy and precision of calibrated arterial pulse contour analysis in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy: a prospective observational clinical trial.

Authors:  Sebastian M Metzelder; Mark Coburn; Christian Stoppe; Michael Fries; Tim-Philipp Simon; Marcus H T Reinges; Anke Höllig; Rolf Rossaint; Gernot Marx; Steffen Rex
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.