Literature DB >> 17650189

Biofilm reduction by a new burn gel that targets nociception.

L Martineau1, H-M Dosch.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the ability of an amorphous first aid topical gel containing vinegar, citric acid and EDTA (RescuDerm(TM); RESC) and various derivative formulations to eradicate Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSEUD) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (STAPH) biofilms. METHODS AND
RESULTS: 24-h biofilms prepared using the Minimum Biofilm Elimination Concentration (MBEC) Assay System were exposed for 4 or 24 h to the different gel formulations. Citric acid-free, acetic acid-free or acetic acid-free/sodium acetate-supplemented RESC gels reduced PSEUD and STAPH biofilm formation as effectively as RESC. Substituting the weak organic acids with equivalent concentrations of glacial acetic acid reduced the effectiveness of gel against PSEUD and STAPH biofilms by half, but viable bacterial counts still remained below 4 log(10) CFU/peg. Removal of gelling agent and/or EDTA enhanced efficacy against PSEUD but not STAPH biofilms. An acidified placebo gel formulation generated an only marginal bactericidal effect compared to that of RESC.
CONCLUSIONS: RESC is a promising new antimicrobial agent. Its weak organic acid content, rather than merely acidic pH, mediates its considerable in vitro bactericidal efficacy against bacterial biofilms. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: These data, taken together with the observation that RescuDerm possesses broad in vitro bactericidal activity against other pathogen species, suggest the potential usefulness of this product for controlling biofilm formation on a variety of cutaneous traumatic and surgical wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17650189     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03249.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  5 in total

1.  Biofilm formation by otopathogenic strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is not consistently inhibited by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.

Authors:  Joseph Zenga; Patricia M Gagnon; Joseph Vogel; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 2.  EDTA: An Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Agent for Use in Wound Care.

Authors:  Simon Finnegan; Steven L Percival
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Antibiofilm Properties of Acetic Acid.

Authors:  Thomas Bjarnsholt; Morten Alhede; Peter Østrup Jensen; Anne K Nielsen; Helle Krogh Johansen; Preben Homøe; Niels Høiby; Michael Givskov; Klaus Kirketerp-Møller
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Anti-biofilm strategies and the need for innovations in wound care.

Authors:  Mary C B Ammons
Journal:  Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov       Date:  2010-01

Review 5.  Advances in the Sensing and Treatment of Wound Biofilms.

Authors:  Sorour Darvishi; Shima Tavakoli; Mahshid Kharaziha; Hubert H Girault; Clemens F Kaminski; Ioanna Mela
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 16.823

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.